Skip to content

Biting the hand that feeds IT

The Register ®

Management:


Related Whitepapers

Comments on ‘Google (re-)branded world's greatest brand’

Better than pigs' feet

Published Tuesday 22nd April 2008 06:02 GMT

« Back to article page

No Vultures? 

By Sceptical Bastard
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 07:16 GMT
Dead Vulture

The Register doesn't appear on the list of 1oo top brands. Shome mishtake, shurely?

i cant believe it! 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 07:54 GMT
Unhappy

What.

No "theRegister" or the "BOFH".

What is the world coming to.

The power of El Reg 

By frank denton
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 07:59 GMT
Thumb Up

Having seen the reference to 'Miss Ida's Pickled Pigs' Feet' in this El Reg article, I now feel that I must try some.

That's what I call power!

Millward Brown Optimor 

By Geoff Mackenzie
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 08:15 GMT

Bet that brand's pretty far down the list ...

PR company 

By Jason Hall
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 08:54 GMT

What - a PR company says that brands are important?

Now why would they say that I wonder?

Schoolboy error 

By Pete
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 09:07 GMT
Stop

"Our data shows that strong brands continue to outperform weak ones in terms of market share and share price during recessions."

No it doesn't. It shows that companies who perform well and have a large market share, will have a more well-known name. Which is pretty obvious.

didn't we have this a week or two ago? 

By Pete
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 10:02 GMT

Last time this came up, a few weeks ago, wasn't it apple or mac or summat that was the "world's most successful brand"?

Maybe this lot polled a different group (from a different world - google earth?) to get a different result. Oh well, I suppose it's just another excuse for a piss-up and someone, somewhere gets another plaque to hang up next to the same one they awarded themselves last year.

Awards are like standards. If you don't like one, just choose another

Tautology, surely 

By Steve
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 10:14 GMT

"Our data shows that strong brands continue to outperform weak ones in terms of market share and share price during recessions."

Surely the measure of a "strong" brand will be that it outperforms other brands in terms of market share and profitability which are then weak by comparison. Essentially he is just saying;

"Strong brand is strong".

We can file this with other insightful pearls of wisdom such as "fire bad, tree pretty" and "don't eat yellow snow".

Branding 

By SpitefulGOD
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 11:13 GMT
Gates Halo

I've always thought that there's a mass market still not being exploited in advertising, I mean why not tattoo porn stars with brand names?

@SpitefulGOD 

By Chris
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 12:21 GMT
Thumb Up

With the *ahem* size of some of the stars, you could tatto so many brands on a particular body part that it'd end up looking like NASCAR.

It's already been tried ... 

By Ken Roberts
Posted Tuesday 22nd April 2008 14:49 GMT
Thumb Up

... about 3 years ago, I forgot her name, but a female had already advertised on E-Bay that she would advertise on her most prominently visible parts.

I'm not sure how much money she made on it, but she received several very good offers.

logotards 

By Mark SPLINTER
Posted Tuesday 29th April 2008 11:45 GMT
Flame

It is a total coincidence that big companies have memorable logos. Logos are a stupid waste of time, etc etc.

whitepaper title

The Perfect (Virtual) Marriage

Get consistent virtual machine storage savings of 50% (often as high as 90%) with virtually no performance impact with NetApp deduplication..
whitepaper title

Gartner Paper: US Data Centers

U.S. enterprise data centers face considerable space and energy constraints over the next few years. Download this free independent report to read more..

Top 20 storiesAll The Week’s HeadlinesArchiveSearch