The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

IBM wants to get youngsters hooked on Power

'We're hip'

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

IBM's Power server evolution will continue through hipness and experimentation.

Many customers out there think of IBM as a stodgy venerable computing powerhouse. The notion that "no one ever got fired for buying IBM" plays well in the corporate data centers that most Power processor-based servers call home. It plays less well, however, in the Web 2.0, SaaSified data centers being built by kids more familiar with the intricacies of Ubuntu than the joys of AIX.

Some members of IBM's executive brass would like to change this situation and thrust Power-based boxes into the hype- and growth-rich portion of the internet build out. All in all, it's not a terrible idea since the Power gear can run Linux natively and even x86 Linux applications through a translator in addition to AIX.

"I think we have another play to make here," Ross Mauri, IBM's general manager for the Power business, told us. "The question is around how we go after Web 2.0 applications and how we reach start-ups."

Evidence of this Power-friendly focus on start-ups can be found in a number of places.

On the research and development front, IBM has the "Kittyhawk" program in place where it's looking to bring today's most popular web applications over to Blue Gene supercomputers, which run on very low power versions of the Power chip. IBM has claimed that "the entire internet" could run on a single system made up of connected Blue Gene machines. While such boxes are expensive up front, IBM thinks that customers could one day save on energy and infrastructure costs by aiming the efficient Blue Gene hardware at web loads.

Nearer term efforts include IBM's "Blue Cloud" project and the PowerNet sales push.

The "Blue Cloud" is rather self-explanatory - a cool-hued mound of fluff. Or rather it's IBM's fledgling approach to utility computing where the company has partnered with a handful of research organizations to ship software as a centralized service. Eventually, IBM should roll out a proper, er, production cloud that will likely offer up WebSphere, DB2 and other applications on a SaaS (software-as-a-service) model that lets customers rent access to hardware and code.

The majority of these utility/cloud type things run on clusters of x86-based servers, and, in fact, IBM's most prominent cloud built with Google relies on 1,600 x86 chips.

IBM's original cloud software, however, was designed on Power-based systems, and now the company wants to make the Power gear central to its ongoing utility projects.

"Power is a key element of our cloud computing strategy," Mauri said.

IBM also has this curious PowerNet thing in place.

The company tells us,

PowerNet is a solutions based selling initiative designed to provide complete end-to-end IT business solutions to customers in small and medium sized organisations. It emphasises the value added from creating a repeatable solution that solves a real business need.

We're not quite sure what that means, but Mauri explained the program as a way for smaller, local sellers to come up with IBM-based hardware, software and services packages that cater to rather specific needs. IBM gives these smaller resellers financial and consulting aid to help them crack fresh markets. In this particular case, IBM is thinking that the PowerNet set might flog Power servers at start-ups.

"You see a company like Sun that has been very in tune with this crowd," Mauri told us. "With PowerNet, we can target specific applications or towns and go after dot-coms. That way we don't have guys in blue suits showing up."

Moving from hipness to experimentation, IBM is already eyeing future directions for the Power server line. While it won't say much at all about the specific design that the Power7 processor will take, it will discuss possible complementary technology.

IBM, for example, is looking at outfitting future Power7 servers with a host of co-processor accelerators that would include the Cell chip in addition to other hardware.

"Having these hybrid systems is an important thing to look at," Mauri said. "We are looking at how to have different processors handle other types of optimized workloads."

The IBM executive mentioned applications such as transaction processing (OLTP) and Java as two possible areas in need of a boost. In order to energize this type of code, IBM could follow the lead of the x86 set and pick up FPGA accelerators that slot into Power processor sockets.

In addition, IBM is looking at creating management software that would help target bits of code at the right accelerators. It's this software that should prove the most difficult bit to pull off. So, for IBM even to explore it even on a research level, represents a decent commitment. ®

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Latest Comments

@Joe Cooper

"I would LOVE to get a Power motherboard and chip and roll my own system."

Actually, there are at least two companies that offer off-the-rack CHRP POWERed desktop boxes for halfway reasonable prices. Probably won't come with AIX, though.

Or the even more generic way, get a Sony PS3 and install YDL or Ubuntu on it, and you've got yourself a Cell-powered PC... Terrasoft even delivers them pre-installed.

0
0

@ Simon

I am 34, and three years ago I started using AIX on POWER5 after I had been using Linux, FreeBSD, and Solaris for years, and before this I had never dealt with IBM before. I can tell you that these POWER boxes are slick, and AIX and VIOS are even slicker. Combine that with the AIX account advocate program, where you get a very technical person/team at IBM to answer all your support questions, and I am now sold on using IBM for years. And soon I will be running RHEL on POWER LPARs on the same hardware as AIX, enabling us to use a common hardware platform for all AIX and Linux.

0
0

Why make FPGA power compatible? It already is in the next spec

AFAIK AMD and IBM agreed to share socket, interconnect semantics and a few other bits for the next generation of chips.

So most FPGA designs done for the Opteron market will slot into future Power systems without any problems. From there on it is a matter of having the OS support and the relevant software available.

Frankly I do not understand why the sudden decision to provide this with the older Power. While there is a considerable installed base covering all MB and OS designs out there on the market will be a total nightmare. Why not rush out the new socket instead?

0
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches