"The institute refused to comment on whether the database was encrypted or password protected."
Meaning: No it was NOT.
"We are taking urgent action to upgrade the protection of our systems against this latest type of threat."
This reads: since we are to stingy to cough up the yearly $300 to get a proper SSL certificate, we'll use RC4-40 and a unique/shared password: Archit3ct, replacing the too obvious passwd.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 11th April 2008 13:28 GMT
How TF would RIBA know that "1,200 other organisations in the US and UK have also been attacked in a similar way"? Particularly since "planted a web address on the databases" doesn't even mean anything, at least in English.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Saturday 12th April 2008 03:22 GMT
A live database cannot be encrypted - only the access key can be, if we are talking one way hash.
If you encrypt the email address say, you still have to decrypt it somewhere on the server.
The only solution is to take the data to a local store, if you wish to use the data but not in conjunction with the site software, so not for login say.
The problem is centralized databases not encryption, if people start to think they just encrypt their data and all is well, they are deluding themselves as the decryption will occur on the server as well. Encryption only works in transit not live. At the point of receive and decryption you are vulnerable.
And yes this 'planted web address on the database' is just babble, it is meaningless.
And it is tempting to block China, maybe block all countries apart from Western Europe, Canada and the USA makes sense for most commercial sites. Actually if that was a campaign we would probably reduce attacks on hosts all over. I see attacks from the US, but that could be a compromised host, less chance of that happening if a block campaign was started. Would make it a little harder for companies to offshore as well, but hey who really is pro that.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Saturday 12th April 2008 11:13 GMT
I've banned Chinese IP addresses from my websites. People who don't do this - what are you gaining from Chinese visitors? Are they buying your goods? Are they contributing in a positive way to your website?
I've also banned all of china. I also went a bit further and banned anything outside the US! : P My company is not international and therefore we don't need anything outside the US... the only thing that comes up is troubleshooting every now and then to allow certain websites, for example the register. : D
Particularly since "planted a web address on the databases" doesn't even mean anything, at least in English.
We were miss quoted you plank.
A web address hosting a Java script was written to a number of fields within the database. With a little digging we found that on the weekend this occurred, a hell of a lot of other sites were also effected.
Comments on: Chinese spammers target 1,200 US, UK firms
take that #
By triky Posted Friday 11th April 2008 08:11 GMT
Ahhhhh... #
By Jerome Posted Friday 11th April 2008 09:00 GMT
1200 targeted - 1 hacked? #
By Mr B Posted Friday 11th April 2008 10:10 GMT
why do we even connect to China? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 11th April 2008 13:18 GMT
Blatant lies #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 11th April 2008 13:28 GMT
Oh no #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Saturday 12th April 2008 03:22 GMT
I've banned Chinese IPs #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Saturday 12th April 2008 11:13 GMT
Who flung dung? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 14th April 2008 04:13 GMT
I've Banned Many Ranges #
By Lance Posted Monday 14th April 2008 16:22 GMT
What the hell do you know? #
By juno Posted Wednesday 16th April 2008 10:55 GMT