Feeds

Google pays for Affero ban

Others to test SaaS license

The essential guide to IT transformation

Google's ban on projects licensed under the Affero GPL license has claimed its first victim. The ClipperZ online password manager has defected to rival code host SourceForge.

ClipperZ said it was transferring from Google Code to SourceForge because it wanted to use AGPL. The AGPL-licensed Orangemesh open source dashboard server is also in the process of moving.

The projects will join around 10 other AGPL-licensed efforts on SourceForge, compared to six on Google Code. Before the defections, Google had been discouraging other AGPL projects, saying Google Code does not support AGPL.

The dispute between Google and developers who want to use AGPL - a version of GPLv3 tailored for use in software as a service - has rumbled on since last November, when AGPL was finalized.

Google's exact reasons for disallowing AGPL remain unclear.

Last November, Google open source program manager Chris DiBona cited a desire to fight proliferation of licenses, adding AGPL had very little market share and had not been certified by the license arbiter the Open Source Initiative.

These arguments are now irrelevant. AGPL was said to be in use by 42 projects after only a month on the OSI-approved list with its use considered important enough to be tracked by licensing specialist Palamida.

Last month, though, DiBona was back, saying AGPL "needs work or more history by a much greater number of adopters" before he'd consider it usable.

Google is a provider of its own SaaS, with things like Gmail and Google Docs and Spreadsheets. It seems DiBona is waiting to see how other SaaS providers deal with clauses that grant recipients a license to run, modify or propagate your work, and for modifications to come with source code.

Pro-AGPL developers have accused Google of blocking the AGPL license because it closes the so-called "ASP loophole'". This omission in the standard GPL license allows service suppliers, such as Google, to improve on open source code with no obligation to pass improvements back to the open source community.

Whatever its reasons, Google needs to get its house in order. ClipperZ is still listed on Google Code along with several other projects licensed under AGPL including Groups Wiki, shogiserver and the inactive Edozun7

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
China hopes home-grown OS will oust Microsoft
Doesn't much like Apple or Google, either
Microsoft refuses to nip 'Windows 9' unzip lip slip
Look at the shiny Windows 8.1, why can't you people talk about 8.1, sobs an exec somewhere
This is how I set about making a fortune with my own startup
Would you leave your well-paid job to chase your dream?
Microsoft cries UNINSTALL in the wake of Blue Screens of Death™
Cache crash causes contained choloric calamity
Eat up Martha! Microsoft slings handwriting recog into OneNote on Android
Freehand input on non-Windows kit for the first time
Linux kernel devs made to finger their dongles before contributing code
Two-factor auth enabled for Kernel.org repositories
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?