Feeds

Loopy Vista pre-SP1 update fixed with pre-pre-SP1 update

Known unknowns squared

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Microsoft has today finally begun pumping out a Windows Vista service pack one (SP1) prerequisite update that had been put on ice, following complaints that it threw some computers into endless reboot cycles.

In February the company was forced to suspend automatic distribution of its servicing stack update (SSU) KB937287 ahead of its planned manual release of Vista SP1 for some, but significantly, not all customers.

Now the software giant insists the problem has been fixed. How so? Why, it’s squirted out a pre-pre-SP1 update, of course.

Microsoft yesterday explained the results of its probe into the issue on its product team blog:

“The SSU has special code to check whether there are any pending reboots or other updates to install. If it sees either of these circumstances, it prevents the install from starting.

“During our investigation, we discovered that there were a few unknown and rare events during the middle of the installation of the update that could cause the update to think it needed a reboot to complete the installation. If this happened, the system entered a repeating reboot loop.”

The post somewhat bafflingly continues:

“To address this problem for people who have not already installed the SSU, we are releasing a fix tomorrow which will install prior to the SP1 Servicing Stack Update. This pre-SSU update helps to ensure a smooth install of the SSU by working to prevent the system from rebooting during the SP1 SSU installation.”

So, Microsoft’s fix involves customers having to install a pre-prerequisite SP1 update to solve the mysterious reboot bug.

Meanwhile, in related Vista SP1 news, the company has also reiterated that it remains “on track” to pump out the service pack to the millions of customers worldwide not using the troubled OS in English, French, German, Japanese and Spanish languages in mid-April as planned.

In addition the firm said automatic distribution of SP1 in the first five languages will happen in waves because there are simply too many “Windows users, so not everyone will get it on the same day.” A manual version of the service pack appeared last month for some customers.

Crucially, however, Microsoft hasn’t written in blood an actual date when the auto SP1 update will be spat out to the masses. The clock is ticking – mid-April is but a week away. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft on the Threshold of a new name for Windows next week
Rebranded OS reportedly set to be flung open by Redmond
Business is back, baby! Hasta la VISTA, Win 8... Oh, yeah, Windows 9
Forget touchscreen millennials, Microsoft goes for mouse crowd
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Apple: SO sorry for the iOS 8.0.1 UPDATE BUNGLE HORROR
Apple kills 'upgrade'. Hey, Microsoft. You sure you want to be like these guys?
ARM gives Internet of Things a piece of its mind – the Cortex-M7
32-bit core packs some DSP for VIP IoT CPU LOL
Lotus Notes inventor Ozzie invents app to talk to people on your phone
Imagine that. Startup floats with voice collab app for Win iPhone
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.