Updated Phorm has admitted that it deleted key factual parts of the Wikipedia article about the huge controversy fired by its advertising profiling deals with BT, Virgin Media and Carphone Warehouse.

The tracking and ad targeting firm said in an email: "We wanted to clarify a number of inaccuracies in the Wikipedia entry on Phorm."

In a telephone conversation, a spokesman for Phorm refused to comment on why it had tried to censor a quotation from The Guardian's commercial executives describing the ethical stance they took against its tracking system. He also refused to talk about the deletion of a passage explaining how BT admitted it misled customers over the 2007 secret trial.

Phorm also deleted a link to the The Register's report on the 2006 trial, and accompanying reference to BT's own document. It said that the aim of the trial was to validate that users were unaware of the presence of the tracking system.

The spokesman said Phorm's PR team had not been aware of Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest. Among many other rules they violated, it states: "Producing promotional articles for Wikipedia on behalf of clients is strictly prohibited."

A BT representative meanwhile wrote in an email: "I don't see anything wrong with correcting Wikipedia articles about your own company or services."

However, the edits made by Phorm included silencing factual primary information, that has been acknowledged as correct by the parties involved. ®

Update

Following publication of this article, Phorm sent us this email:

Hi Chris

We let you know yesterday that we had proposed amendments to the Phorm entry on Wikipedia – there were several factual inaccuracies that were pointed out to us. Having reviewed our suggested changes with hindsight, we accept that we were a little over zealous in our efforts to make those corrections and that we erroneously removed some relevant items in the editing process. These were quickly reinstated by Wikipedia’s editors. We will endeavour to make sure that this does not happen in the future.

Related stories

• NSFW Wikipedia plumbs the filthy depths of plumbing (14 October 2008)
• Exclusive Phorm failed to mention 'illegal' trials at Home Office meeting in 2007 (18 June 2008)
• EU mulls intervention over BT's secret Phorm trials (10 June 2008)
• Phorm opponents to picket BT shareholders (30 May 2008)
• Virgin Media distances itself from Phorm 'adoption' claims (1 May 2008)
• Anti-Spyware Coalition probes data pimping (25 April 2008)
• Updated Home Office defends 'dangerously misleading' Phorm thumbs-up (24 April 2008)
• BT's secret Phorm trials open door to corporate eavesdropping (17 April 2008)
• BT's 'illegal' 2007 Phorm trial profiled tens of thousands (14 April 2008)
• O2 PR calls Reg readers 'techie nerds' (9 April 2008)
• Updated Information Commissioner: Phorm must be opt-in only (9 April 2008)
• FIPR: ICO gives BT 'green light for law breaking' with Phorm (7 April 2008)
• Updated BT: 'We did not let anyone down over Phorm... it was not illegal' (3 April 2008)
• Exclusive BT and Phorm secretly tracked 18,000 customers in 2006 (1 April 2008)
• MPs pile pressure on ISPs over Phorm (28 March 2008)
• Updated The Guardian ditches Phorm (26 March 2008)
• BT admits misleading customers over Phorm experiments (17 March 2008)
• Interview Phorm launches data pimping fight back (7 March 2008)
• BT targets 10,000 data pimping guinea pigs (5 March 2008)
• Updated The Phorm files (29 February 2008)