Rogue trader sues SocGen for unfair dismissal
Bank 'failed to prove he did anything wrong'
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Rogue trader Jérôme Kerviel, accused of losing Société Générale €4.9bn (£3.8bn), is to sue his former employer for unfair dismissal, the Times reports.
The 31-year-old, who was last month released on bail from prison after 37 days incarceration on breach of trust, fabricating documents, and illegally accessing computers raps, argues that his ejection from SocGen for gross misconduct is unlawful "because the bank has failed to prove he did anything wrong".
Kerviel's case rests on two points: that his massive gambles on markets were "actually in the black when his bosses stepped in", and that "French labour laws force employers to hold face-to-face meetings with employees to outline the case for terminating their work contract".
Regarding the former, Kerviel's lawyers stress "he was often successful when betting the bank’s money on the stock market and was €1.4bn up at the end of last year". They assert that SocGen was in fact responsible for the whopping loss after executives "took the decision to unwind Mr Kerviel’s positions as shares were tumbling on the world’s markets in January".
The latter point hinges on a "legal technicality". Kerviel's lawyers note that the required meeting is "impossible because Mr Kerviel’s bail conditions forbid him from entering into contact with SocGen staff".
Kerviel's legal team has duly filed papers "arguing that the dismissal process should be cancelled", but the Times understands he "does not envisage a return to his old job as a derivatives operator at SocGen". If he's successful in his claim, SocGen may be forced to pay compensation. ®
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
COMMENTS
@Sascha Zierfuss
Excuse me, but his job is as a *TRADER* !! His "crime" is not that he should or should not have *traded* but that he traded way over the limits imposed on him !! When he was making money, the management were quietly pocketing their bonuses. When the times got hard, they panicked and forced the unwinding of the trades he had done at an extremely bearish time !! *THAT* caused the losses !! If they had kept their nerve and hung on, they may have have ridden out these bearish times and the trades may have been fine.
I strongly that SocGen had (and still have) troubles elsewhere within the bank and they are using this poor sod as the scapegoat for their sins !! I support his suing the pantalon off them, if only to expose the sins they were trying to sweep under the carpet !!
Guilty or not inocent?
SocGen may be guilty of being lax but, come on this guy knew what he was doing. If he is innocent so was Hitler.
Icon? That me.
@Steve
You make a company about 1.4 bn euros, that's about 1 *BILLION* pounds, or just over 2 *BILLION* dollars, and all you get is a £63K paycheck?
i'd be in my boss's office threatening him with GBH and the russian mafia if i did not get a 1% bonus of that!
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud based data management
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
