By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 4th April 2008 00:10 GMT
Its been in use for 20 years, and is *very* widely used with easy access to all the components, and yet they've only just got around to cracking it. And even then it isn't trivial. And it needed help from a Wiki entry. (Who posted that by the way - a rival supplier?)
For cars it'll still be easier to just steal the keys, as this will get you around all the security systems not just the KeeLoq part. (Immobiliser transponder is usually a different system to the remote locking transmitter, so wouldn't be touched by this)
As for building security, if your only security relies on a chip card then you aren't trying hard enough.
I'm sure people will use this for bad things, but I'm not sure the threat is particularly severe - at least for now.
How far is a meter? All of my meters are significantly different in size. The only one I could use for measuring distance is my metremeter and that is just over a metre long.
ok, so for around "$3,000" in equipment (what's that in real money? probably down to £50 by now?) you can have an attack that lets you sit around some types of vehicle, wait for someone to open their car, then do some analysis of the data, and then next time they leave their car there you can come back and get in, sounds like a good investment
however personally i would go for the even smarter investment, around £5 can get you a hammer, which can gain you instant access to any type of vehicle, no waiting around, no wondering if that vehicle is vulnerable to your snooping or not, you just walk up to the car, use your vehicle entry device, and get instant access - as an added bonus the hammer can also be used as a weapon if the vehicles owner should catch you in the act - and that's not all, buy now and your hammer comes complete with the ability to control construction equipment such as "the nail", this is a limited time offer so buy now to avoid being disappointed
By Charles ManningPosted Friday 4th April 2008 02:09 GMT
Good old mechanical vehicle/garage locks have been "cracked" since the beginning of locksmithing. That does not mean that all cars get pinched.
Locking a vehicle or building just sets a barrier to entry: effort/risk/cost vs payback. When you lock a car you just make it a bit harder to steal and the crim will hopefully steal some other car or not bother that night.
Cracking Keeloq just changes the payback curve. Buying a few $K of fancy kit plus doing fancy sums is still beyond what the average thief is prepared to do.
By Tim BatesPosted Friday 4th April 2008 04:44 GMT
Most people with an automatic garage door also have a door from the garage into the house. And 99% of people will leave that unlocked, since no one can open the garage door anyway, right?
It wouldn't be hard to imagine an organised burglary group implementing this. It'd make getting in easier and less obvious to neighbours. If the owner is out, then they'd even be able to park a ute in the garage and load up undetected.
Of course an alarm system foils that, but there'd be tonnes of suburban houses that have remote garage doors and no alarm.
As for the spelling of the base metric distance unit... metres is the correct spelling, and US spelling is pointless if the US residents refuse to use them.
Just to nit-pick, isn't the idea of a one-time pad that it is used only once?
Well, anyone who owns a Prius must be fairly miffed... #
By Oliver JonesPosted Friday 4th April 2008 08:14 GMT
...since Toyota dispensed with keys entirely, and the car just uses the proximity of a remote unit to authorise entry and enable starting of the car. Anyone with an appopriately-programmed remote could, in theory, just walk up to the car, open the door, get in, press the Start button and drive away. Easy as that.
Wonder how many more Prius models we'll see on eBay in the next 12 months? Still, I'm glad this vulnerability came out now. I want to buy a new VW Golf next year, and I'd prefer one that can't be opened so easily...
Personally, I'm not at much risk. Not because my old Rover has an alternative means of entry - I'm just as stiffed as anyone else whose protection has been cracked. It's just that my car is probably worth less than £200 - and it has its steering wheel on the wrong side, so anyone trying to steal it must be very, very desperate. :)
By Fatty TreatsPosted Friday 4th April 2008 08:35 GMT
Several correspondents argue that this is not that useful or easily used security hole, e.g. Mike points out this is "an attack that lets you sit around some types of vehicle, wait for someone to open their car, then do some analysis of the data, and then next time they leave their car there you can come back and get in". Doesn't the article say that once you crack it you can do it for any *model*?
So you while away a few hours in a Tesco car park after which you can open *any* Ford Focus/Honda Accord/generic Toyota... sounds alright to me.
You'd arrive early and park near a large lawyers/bankers/rich bastards' office and clone about twenty keys as people arrive in the morning. The next day, a bunch of people with caps pulled low for the cameras calmly walk in and drive off with a lot of very expensive cars.
To much work for your average herbert, but a reasonable return on your investment if you choose the right target.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 4th April 2008 09:04 GMT
Actually, I thought that was how they worked. I remember reading an article about the technology: they had an overlap so you could press the key button a few times without getting out of sync with the car even if you were out of range; if you pressed it 50 times or so, it would stop working.
Is that a good looking female sheep, about a metre long?
So $300, or €80 to break into a lot of cars without damage or being too suspicious. Sounds like a good investment if you're that way inclined. Especially as the price will fall if it's worked on a bit more.
My cars a Fiat so the remote never works anyway............
"I'm not sure the threat is particularly severe" #
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 4th April 2008 09:32 GMT
Well no, but the words "master keys", "posted on Interwebs" and "within 1 week" come to mind.
By Joe HarrisonPosted Friday 4th April 2008 09:41 GMT
When I were a lad your car key was made of one slim piece of metal and if you lost it you had another one cut for 2/6d. Now it's a chunky lump of plastic and a new one costs 200 quid. You're over a barrel too if you want to get back into your motor. I hope someone does flog off cheap replacements that you can reprogram yourself.
By Gavin NottagePosted Friday 4th April 2008 10:11 GMT
Cars come with two keys, so would they have separate sequences, or try and sync up somehow? I guess they'd go for separate. It would mean if you lost a key, the stealership would just need to reprogram the car's part for a new key - or more likely open up some module and replace the corresponding chip/board for the new one - pretty expensive, but then people shouldn't lose keys!
By Mister CheesePosted Friday 4th April 2008 10:43 GMT
@Oliver
Keyless entry in the Prius is not an option on the UK models.
@AC(@Dan) - Septics have a smaller pint than us hardy Brits. So when one of them brags to you he drank 5 pints of beer in one night, he actually means only 4 pints of shandy.
@Dan - It's spelled 'metre' since it's based on the Greek 'metron'. Ask 100%-accurate Wikipedia if you don't believe me. A meter is what I use to counter-argue my extortionate gas-bill. That's that gaseous form of gas, and not the liquid-form you favour over there...
Aluminium is actually pronounced aluminum; the boffins (a phrase popular with El Reg) some time ago decided that the name didn't look right on the periodic table next to Plutonium, Caesium, Francium, and other elements. They decided to add the extra "i" to make it look pretty.
I believe the latest model Micras use this sort of keyless entry, although I think it applies to starting the car, not sure about opening the door though.
By Simon WardPosted Friday 4th April 2008 12:24 GMT
"I believe the latest model Micras use this sort of keyless entry, although I think it applies to starting the car, not sure about opening the door though."
Renault have been using card keys for a while, and I dare bet you'll find a fair few Laguna owners who aren't that keen on the idea (let's just say that the keycard system had a few, erm, issues when it first came out)
Makes me glad I'm running a 10yo Clio - even if someone was taken with an urge to nick it, and had the keys, they'd more than likely give up before the immobiliser decided to disarm itself :-)
"Davy proposed the name aluminum for the metal and later agreed to change it to aluminum. Shortly thereafter, the name aluminum was adopted to conform with the "ium" ending of most elements, and this spelling is now in use elsewhere in the world"
which makes no sense at all - they've spelt it wrong there somewhere, but which one?
and anyway - the point is not the pronouciation of the end of the word, it's the begining bit that the sceptics have trouble with. it's not aloo-minum, it's al-u-min-um(ium whichever)
By JeffyPoohPosted Friday 4th April 2008 13:34 GMT
By your "Pringles" etc. comment you appear to assume that the keyfob is transmitting in the 2.4 GHz. Not every consumer electronics uses the same 2.4 GHz band. My keyfob, like most, isn't 2.4 GHz. It is, like many, in the 300-something MHz band. Makes your high gain antenna pretty unweildy. Your Pringles can WiFi antenna would have to be replaced with a garbage can size keyfob-compatible antenna.
So, beware hackers loitering on the sidewalk and aiming tripod-mounted garbage cans in your direction while fiddling with their laptop.
By Michael KeanPosted Friday 4th April 2008 13:41 GMT
@ Chewy:
I once hardwired a cordless doorbell transmitter to a 12v battery on my bicycle years ago, so if the bike was nicked (small town) I could find it again with the doorbell. Side effect unexpectedly was that it jammed car door opener buttons within 10-20 metres of the bike. Perhaps there is something similar at the cop shop?
By Andus McCoatoverPosted Friday 4th April 2008 14:19 GMT
Actually, good point, I didn't think of that.
<<So, beware hackers loitering on the sidewalk and aiming tripod-mounted garbage cans in your direction while fiddling with their laptop.>>
So, I'd need to equip myself with an RFID-enabled, (recycled) tinfoil-lined Wheelie bin, and wear a donkey jacket and some wellies to appear in "Mufti".
'Course, I'd need to choose the 'correct' day of the week^H^H^H^H fortnightly collection day for me to get away with it, but, hell your 10-year old Lada's maybe worth it! (if all I can afford is a donkey jacket). Er, did they have radio in them thar days?
</Joke!> Have a good weekend! -Andy
(Mine's the jacket in the wheelie bin. Yep, the one that smells a bit. Ta Muchly.)
By StopthePropagandaPosted Friday 4th April 2008 16:07 GMT
must've watched "Gone in 60 Seconds" too many times. The "new" version and the original.
Social engineering cracks thru fancy encoded key security for cars as well as passwords for PC's.
As for the hammer guys, there's an even easier (lazier) way to get thru even the most advanced auto security, deployed by west coast and east coast "gangstas" for years: the carjacking. Let the owner disable the security system then threaten to kill them if they don't get out of the car. Modern variations by "undocumented" gangs on the West Coast includes shooting them even after they get out of the car just to prove brutality.
By David WiernickiPosted Saturday 5th April 2008 12:16 GMT
Shooting people after they get out wouldn't be terribly bright, as people would realize pretty soon that they're just as well off clobbering the throttle as obeying the carjacker.
Gangstas may be mean, but they're not dumb.
In other news... Jimmy entry with Wikipedia? A touch of class, Reg. Well-played.
By Matt BradleyPosted Saturday 5th April 2008 17:51 GMT
Yep - I have similar problem with my >10 year old motor. Under certain circumstances, when parked in particular locations, the "lock" button refuses to work. Move ten metres (or is that meters.. hehe!), and it works fine. Personally, I suspect that it is Wi Fi networks interfering with my key / receiver.
As regards the original article / exploit: I imagine this will be very useful to organised cirminals trying to gain access to large properties / expensive cars, but not much use to anybody else. Anything that requires the villian to hang around with a few kilos of electronic equipment just in order to clone the key is going to be worthless to the average car thief or burglar: they can just break a window. I imagine that the manufacturers of high end home security systems and executive motors are already using security far more sophisticated than this, so this makes this discovery a non-problem.
Nice to see boffins are still doing their jobs well but personally, I'm still more worried about some scally smashing my window for my radio, than some techie sitting in the bushes with a laptop.
There is a strong suspicion that the new Police Tetra radio system can upset car door locks and fancy ignition systems if set up carelessly.
There is probably a Tetra base station at your Police Station.
I don't think I would want a car that unlocked/locked depending on the proximity of a keyfob. I suspect I would soon have a flat battery and worn out locking mechanism, as it is parked just outside the window!
People don't use these kinds of locks because they don't want their car stolen. They use them because they think they're cool. To prevent theft of your car, you pull a spark plug wire when you leave it. If you're really serious, pull the fuel line too. That worked in the old days and I'm sure it works even better nowadays when everybody is a nerd and nobody is a mechanic.
By Jon AldridgePosted Sunday 6th April 2008 09:23 GMT
...will be to come back to an emptied car, then have the insurance company monkey tell you that in the absence of any signs of forced entry, it can only be that you forgot to lock it, so it's not their problem.
By Solomon GrundyPosted Sunday 6th April 2008 15:28 GMT
Lots of car jackings result in the owner being shot even after they have surrendered the vehicle - a simple search will return hundreds of news entries for the U.S. alone.
Criminals don't have to be bright, victims just have to be stupid(er). This pansified country that is the U.S. has turned self-defense into a crime too, so the peasants are afraid to defend themselves.
South Africa is even worse, they don't even count the car jackings that result in murder anymore because it is so common - they even have a thriving industry built around preventing car jacking: http://transportation.frost.com/prod/servlet/market-insight-top.pag?docid=JSAA-5NCK62&ctxixpLink=FcmCtx25&ctxixpLabel=FcmCtx26.
By Daniel B.Posted Monday 7th April 2008 23:41 GMT
Enter Mexico City.
From midnight to 5am, it is perfectly legal to run red-lights. Why, you may ask? Because standard procedure is that if you see some strange dude coming to your car at a stoplight, you just floor it and take off, no matter what color the stoplights on.
Carjackings over here very often involve violence, gunshots, or "express kidnappings" consisting in said carjackers taking you for a nice city tour, withdrawing cash from your credit and debit bankcards. Oh, and occasionally you'll get shot even if you do comply.
Dead vulture after getting mugged in the Buenos Aires neighborhood.
Comments on: Wikipedia-reading boffins jimmy keyless door to entire universe
Makes me glad... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 3rd April 2008 23:31 GMT
Can't be that bad #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 4th April 2008 00:10 GMT
Minor nit #
By R Callan Posted Friday 4th April 2008 00:21 GMT
equipment costs #
By Mike Posted Friday 4th April 2008 01:38 GMT
So what? #
By Charles Manning Posted Friday 4th April 2008 02:09 GMT
@Minor nit #
By Dan Goodin Posted Friday 4th April 2008 02:24 GMT
@Mike #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 4th April 2008 03:27 GMT
Hammer Time? #
By Ned Ludd Posted Friday 4th April 2008 03:52 GMT
Garage door = entry to houses. #
By Tim Bates Posted Friday 4th April 2008 04:44 GMT
Customers the big loosers here #
By Keith T Posted Friday 4th April 2008 05:28 GMT
One time pads now practical #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 4th April 2008 06:16 GMT
Don't these guys know the basics? #
By Dave Bell Posted Friday 4th April 2008 07:20 GMT
Re: One time pads now practical #
By Humph Posted Friday 4th April 2008 08:07 GMT
Well, anyone who owns a Prius must be fairly miffed... #
By Oliver Jones Posted Friday 4th April 2008 08:14 GMT
Ramifications #
By Fatty Treats Posted Friday 4th April 2008 08:35 GMT
You wouldn't use this to steal just ONE car... #
By Steve Posted Friday 4th April 2008 08:50 GMT
@Dan Goodin #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 4th April 2008 08:58 GMT
re: One time pads now practical #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 4th April 2008 09:04 GMT
Ute #
By Matt Posted Friday 4th April 2008 09:25 GMT
"I'm not sure the threat is particularly severe" #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 4th April 2008 09:32 GMT
Serves them right for being so greedy #
By Joe Harrison Posted Friday 4th April 2008 09:41 GMT
@Dan Goodin #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 4th April 2008 09:59 GMT
@Keith T - while we're being picky.... #
By Martin Posted Friday 4th April 2008 10:02 GMT
@AC #
By Remy Redert Posted Friday 4th April 2008 10:05 GMT
re: One time pads now practical #
By Gavin Nottage Posted Friday 4th April 2008 10:11 GMT
@Oliver, AC and Dan #
By Mister Cheese Posted Friday 4th April 2008 10:43 GMT
@AC (American language pedant) #
By Ash Posted Friday 4th April 2008 11:16 GMT
$3000 dollars worth of equipment? #
By Gilleain Torrance Posted Friday 4th April 2008 11:32 GMT
@Oliver and Mr Cheese #
By Test Man Posted Friday 4th April 2008 11:40 GMT
"...requires....specialized skills..." #
By JeffyPooh Posted Friday 4th April 2008 12:18 GMT
Generic title #
By Simon Ward Posted Friday 4th April 2008 12:24 GMT
@Ash - aluminium #
By jai Posted Friday 4th April 2008 12:26 GMT
@JeffyPooh #
By Andus McCoatover Posted Friday 4th April 2008 12:40 GMT
interesting #
By Chewy Posted Friday 4th April 2008 12:57 GMT
@Andus McCoatover #
By JeffyPooh Posted Friday 4th April 2008 13:34 GMT
Door Bell #
By Michael Kean Posted Friday 4th April 2008 13:41 GMT
@JeffyPooh - Good Point! #
By Andus McCoatover Posted Friday 4th April 2008 14:19 GMT
somebody #
By StopthePropaganda Posted Friday 4th April 2008 16:07 GMT
At least in the states #
By PM Posted Friday 4th April 2008 17:34 GMT
@ Martin #
By Charlie van Becelaere Posted Friday 4th April 2008 19:43 GMT
@StopThePropoganda #
By David Wiernicki Posted Saturday 5th April 2008 12:16 GMT
@AC - One Time Pad #
By RaelianWingnut Posted Saturday 5th April 2008 16:08 GMT
@Chewy #
By Matt Bradley Posted Saturday 5th April 2008 17:51 GMT
@@ Chewy #
By Oldfogey Posted Sunday 6th April 2008 00:07 GMT
Old school #
By Ole Juul Posted Sunday 6th April 2008 05:15 GMT
But what will be particularly annoying... #
By Jon Aldridge Posted Sunday 6th April 2008 09:23 GMT
@David Wiernicki #
By Solomon Grundy Posted Sunday 6th April 2008 15:28 GMT
@Chewy #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 7th April 2008 15:15 GMT
@Solomon Grundy #
By Daniel B. Posted Monday 7th April 2008 23:41 GMT