US scientists have said switching anti-global warming efforts to tackling the production of soot would offer a quicker return than cutting CO₂ emissions.

According to US scientists, enormous damage is being done by soot, which is being created by the combustion of fossil fuels and as an indirect result of deforestation, among other factors.

Professor Greg Carmichael, of the University of Iowa and Professor V Ramanathan, of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, argue that tackling the emissions of soot offers a far quicker chance to address global warming than trying to reduce CO₂ emissions. They said this is because soot has a much shorter lifetime than CO₂, which can hang about for around 100 years.

The scientists, who published their research in the Nature Geoscience journal on Sunday, estimate that soot will have a surface warming effect on the Earth of "about 0.5 to 1 deg C". They say its energy effect is around 0.9 watts per square metre, substantially more than the 0.2 - 0.4 watts per square metre estimated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Most of the world's soot was created by Europe and North America until the 1950s, but since then the two regions have been overtaken in their contribution by nations in the tropics and the Far East.

In less developed countries, soot is created by cooking with biofuels such as wood, dung and crop residue. It's also produced by so-called open biomass burning, which is associated with deforestation and burning crops. ®

Related stories

• Prehistoric titanic-snake jungles laughed at global warming (13 October 2009)
• Old ships' logs show temporary global warming in 1730s (4 August 2008)
• American physicists warned not to debate global warming (21 July 2008)
• Climate profs 'can't recommend' enormo-space-parasol (23 May 2008)
• Governator outs Dubya's global-warming 'time bomb' (25 April 2008)
• Minister: Waste wood is 'huge potential resource' (10 April 2008)
• Global-warming scientist: It's worse than I thought (7 April 2008)
• US scientists puncture the ethanol biofuel bubble (13 February 2008)
• When poor people pollute - the Tata Nano and eco-crime (12 February 2008)
• Scientists warn on climatic 'tipping points' (5 February 2008)
• Nobel Prize winner demands more honesty from peers in green debate (2 February 2008)
• On Philip Pullman's grim eco-fantasy (24 January 2008)
• Philip Pullman: Kill humans and ration heating (21 January 2008)
• Government told to ditch biofuel targets (21 January 2008)