Security:
News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘P2P highwayman gets four years for ID theft’Dodgy downloader sent downPublished Tuesday 18th March 2008 18:54 GMT
Not tooooo clever!!!By Robert-James Cooledge
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 20:02 GMT
Clveer to do it BUT not too clever as he got caught. Should have moved to the UK and then only his wrist would have been slapped. WELL DONE THE USofA. Sick of UK. What a jokeBy pet
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 20:23 GMT
this guy did not 'pinch' the information, the 'victim's' freely made the information available, its their fault if they can't configure a simple program for the brain dead like limewire. Re: What a jokeBy Dam
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 09:23 GMT
I was thinkiing just that. However please notice that he's not been convicted for *data theft* or unauthorized introduction into a computer system; but for ID theft. The court didn't retain the introduction bit because there was no crime related to getting the files, as they were willingly offered. @PetBy Spleen
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 09:47 GMT
If I wear my MP3 player on my belt or somewhere similarly vulnerable, rather than in my pocket, it's still theft to swipe it. For that matter, if I'm not standing in a martial arts guard, it's still assault to punch me in the face. Not that cleverBy Elmer Phud
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 10:05 GMT
If he obtained the info from people who had just shared their entire P.C. then there's not a small amount of "What did they expect?". Not so much stealing as things being left outside the house with a sign on saying "Please take me" and he obliged. Are people who were happy to download unlicensed stuff complaining that they were robbed? (needs Victor Meldrew icon here) If you don't want your telly nicked why leave the front door open. At least only share a folder or three - a separate partition where only stuff to be shared would be advisable (and then the anti-virus set to scan after a file is complete). No I.T. angle - not even a need for stripey jumper and bag with swag if it was that easy. It's not illegal to be tech unsavvyBy b
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 11:48 GMT
Yes, they were dumb. No, they didn't deserve to get ripped off. Off your high horses please nerds. More Daily Mail nonsenseBy John Band
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 11:50 GMT
"Should have moved to the UK and then only his wrist would have been slapped" I'd be interested to see a story in the UK of someone who stole £75k directly from members of the public escaping without chokey; if there are any such examples, I'd be utterly amazed if they weren't very young, very old or mothers of dependent children. @ bBy Andy Morrell
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 13:08 GMT
"It's not illegal to be tech unsavvy" it should be..... There have been report on El Reg before about "Computer Licencing". http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/21/computer_competence_tests/ It's a good idea. There are so many things so called "bad" people can do due to the "tech unsavvy". Well now I've stoked the fire have fun :) Dollars, not PoundsBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 13:41 GMT
$73k equates to roughly £38k (probably nearer £35k next week). I know of one individual who forged signatures, stole banking details, took out a credit card in "someone else's" name and then passed themself off as that "someone else" managing to fraudulently obtain goods and services well worth over £20k whilst also fraudulently claiming excess benefits and failing to disclose other income for taxation purposes. The individual then skipped the country and in so doing effectively abducted a young child. Their location is known by the courts and NOTHING has been done. Yes, SHE is a mother of dependent children. What ever happened to Equality of the Sexes? Anonymous, otherwise the register won't be allowed to publish. @ john bandBy Gilbert Wham
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 13:53 GMT
You can probably find some with a quick trawl through the news archives. However, I'll guarantee they won't be very young, very old or mothers of dependent children. Captains of industry maybe? MPs? Peers of the realm? @ John BandBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 14:01 GMT
"I'd be interested to see a story in the UK of someone who stole £75k directly from members of the public escaping without chokey" MP's seem to get away with it again and again! @ John BandBy Slaine
Posted Wednesday 19th March 2008 16:33 GMT
Before a multitude of massive benefits, expenses, freebies, bonuses and bribes (oops sorry, financial incentives that are not designed in any way to sway one's opinion), extra income from future jobs lined up whilst in position, gifts from foreign visitors, transport and security freely laid on and, indeed before not paying tax, the Prime Minister is good for some £100k. The period for commenting on this story has finished
|
|
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search