Feeds

Beeb's DAB failfest 'costs £25 per set'

20th time lucky?

Security for virtualized datacentres

The New Year has seen another BBC TV campaign to persuade radio listeners to move to digital. This means moving to DAB, the obsolete broadcasting technology the world has snubbed, and Britain has, too.

Thanks to Steve Green, we can begin to gauge the extent of this campaign.

The latest salvo is the corporation's 20th effort to persuade us to switch to DAB, he notes. Steve calculated how much this would cost if the DAB campaign had to pay the going rate for advertising, in a feature for Hi-Fi World, where he's a columnist. But that was over two years ago; he's now updated the sums.

If the ad campaign is measured in terms of commercial advertising rates, the cost would be £163m. Since 6.5 million DAB sets have shifted, this is the equivalent of £25 per set.

A boat full of Fail

Landfill... DAB... roll your own caption

But the difference now is that DAB is obsolete, and about as attractive as jumping on the Titanic as it leaves port. Today's digital radio sets can't be updated to use more efficient codecs, such as AAC+, and are incompatible with the successor to DAB, DAB+, that much of the rest of the world is eyeing. So why the relentless promotion?

Well, DAB has to be the best thing to happen to the Corporation in the past decade. It screws commercial radio rivals, who hand over £100,000 for a property (licence), and then must give the "penthouse suite" back to the public broadcaster. The paltry audiences for DAB mean the commercial operators must bleed red ink, while the BBC runs its own deeply subsidised digital broadcasts. Trebles all round!

That's why you're unlikely to hear the true extent of the digital radio fiasco on the Beeb itself, and why the digital propaganda is likely to continue - as relentless as those exhortations to "Send us your views".

Urging the public to buy obsolete technology is absurd at any cost: the BBC should suspend this expensive campaign of deception, and get level with the public. ®

You lot seem to have the measure of DAB, judging by your feedback - many thanks for that.

Reducing the cost and complexity of web vulnerability management

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
JINGS! Microsoft Bing called Scots indyref RIGHT!
Redmond sporran metrics get one in the ten ring
Driving with an Apple Watch could land you with a £100 FINE
Bad news for tech-addicted fanbois behind the wheel
Murdoch to Europe: Inflict MORE PAIN on Google, please
'Platform for piracy' must be punished, or it'll kill us in FIVE YEARS
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Sony says year's losses will be FOUR TIMES DEEPER than thought
Losses of more than $2 BILLION loom over troubled Japanese corp
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.