Feeds

Web startups crumble under Amazon S3 outage

With what shall I Twitter my daily minutia!?

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

Amazon Web Services was struck by a temporary outage today, dragging the thousands of web sites which rely on its hosted storage down with it.

Reports of content stored on Amazon's Simple Storage Service (S3) being unavailable or performing poorly began appearing around 5AM PST.

Hardest hit by the outage was the crowd of "web 2.0" startups that lean on hosted storage to keep costs down, such as the messaging service Twitter. But even the New York Times, which uses S3 to store articles from its historical archives, was spitting out internal server error messages.

Amazon has a pretty good track record in keeping its hosting services running. It's had some growing pains in the past, but this is the service's first major outage.

Service was restored a few hours later at 7:17 AM PST according to an Amazon technician.

"My business is effectively closed right now because Amazon did something wrong. I'll have to reconsider using the service now," wrote one customer on Amazon's web developer forum.

"This is the first outage I have experienced since I joined the service nearly a year ago. Yes it sucks, yes I hope they get it fixed very soon... but, the sky is not in fact falling at the moment," wrote another.

One likely outcome from Amazon's slip-up is some additional transparency in reporting future errors. S3 technicians were slow to confirm the problem and didn't provide any status updates to its customers. It took one hour to verify the outage from the first complaint on their developer board, and the S3 rep didn't post again until they resolved the issue.

"What really annoys me is the lack of an official explanation from Amazon (as usual)," posted one user.

"A health monitor would be useful - something to show what Amazon thinks the status of the services are and to post official information," wrote another.

Amazon said later that one of its three data centers for S3 was unreachable, beginning at 4:31 AM PST. It was back to "near normal" performance at 6:48 AM PST.

"Though we're proud of our uptime track record over the past two years with this service, any amount of downtime is unacceptable and we won't be satisfied until it's perfect," an Amazon rep posted.

An ultimately undeliverable "perfect" record may be the wrong message to be sending out. Maybe Amazon should start with convincing its users it'll do a better job than if they set up storage themselves. ®

Build a business case: developing custom apps

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
VMware's high-wire balancing act: EVO might drag us ALL down
Get it right, EMC, or there'll be STORAGE CIVIL WAR. Mark my words
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
VMware vaporises vCHS hybrid cloud service
AnD yEt mOre cRazy cAps to dEal wIth
prev story

Whitepapers

A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Maximize storage efficiency across the enterprise
The HP StoreOnce backup solution offers highly flexible, centrally managed, and highly efficient data protection for any enterprise.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.