Skip to content

Biting the hand that feeds IT

The Register ®

Comms:


Related Whitepapers

Comments on ‘Vodafone CEO finds wireless too complicated’

Why can't things be more simple like when I were a lad?

Published Tuesday 12th February 2008 14:43 GMT

« Back to article page

I completely agree! 

By Shaun
Posted Tuesday 12th February 2008 15:24 GMT
Jobs Horns

.......with the line about binning macs............

For the sake of platform simplicity ... 

By Andrew Heenan
Posted Tuesday 12th February 2008 16:55 GMT
Thumb Down

"But by that logic we should all just accept the inevitable and cast our desktop Macs into the ocean, for the sake of platform simplicity."

Why do you spoil all your stuff with childish conclusions?

Voda has a point, and one that could be discussed constructively, not dismissed in this way. You may not like their CEO, but he isn't opening his mouth just for you to get cheap laughs.

At this moment, the number of mobile platforms is increasing almost exponentially (AOL?!!), and life is not only more complex, but more expensive - and sooner or later, the consumer will pay.

So why not delete the cr*p, and start again with a serious discussion. Thanks!

Don't use that! Use this. 

By Edward Pearson
Posted Tuesday 12th February 2008 17:14 GMT
Stop

Don't use one of the many wireless technologies out there! Use OURS!!

The nice thing about standards .... 

By Danny Thompson
Posted Wednesday 13th February 2008 07:18 GMT
Paris Hilton

I tend to agree with Sarin. And he could take a lead by getting in behind WiMAX to show how committed he and Vodafone are to his plea for unity. Vodafone, as the worlds largest mobile network operator, should take a lead in supporting and deploying ready-for-market WiMAX into its existing network of towers.

But the cynic in me says that instead we are much more likely to see Vodafone work with the other network operators on LTE as a rival, and deliberately incompatible, technology. We can expect America and Japan to continue their line of isolationism and market protection (they can barely handle the concept of GSM and UMTS). And so the theme will continue.

But in an ideal world - the first to market would win (WiMAX), be deployed globally, and the customer be given free reign to roam wherever they wanted without being kicked into touch for daring to use their mobile device in another land.

Paris, because she likes a bit of inter-compatibility

What if WiMAX beats LTE ? 

By EmperorFromage
Posted Wednesday 13th February 2008 12:43 GMT
Alien

WiMax is primarily an IP infrastructure. SIP / Skype / whatever will happily run on top of it. LTE on the other hand is a more insidious creature that comes bundled with IMS - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_Multimedia_Subsystem - which is just a way for the carriers to continue gouging their customers by preserving the current pricing structure over an IP network. The current structure has FAIL written all over it, hence the EU commissions need to rein in exorbitant roaming charges.

WiMax has the potential to introduce a flat affordable IP roaming arrangement, and rid us of antiquated differentiated asymmetric billing rates, which never has made any sense. ( Why different price to call A->B than B->A ? )

whitepaper title

Solution Brief: Reduce Energy Costs

Energy consumption has become a big issue. Dramatically increase server utilization and significantly reduce energy costs through Virtualization..
whitepaper title

Server Consolidation and Containment

This paper discusses how consolidation and containment solutions with a virtual infrastructure meet the challenges of server sprawl and underutilization..

Top 20 storiesAll The Week’s HeadlinesArchiveSearch