Skip to content

Biting the hand that feeds IT

The Register ®

Management:


Related Whitepapers

Comments on ‘Yahoo! shares! rise! above! offer! price!’

Microsoft may pay more

Published Friday 8th February 2008 10:53 GMT

« Back to article page

Don't! buy! Yahoo! 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Friday 8th February 2008 11:30 GMT
Gates Horns

Put! AdBlocker! Into! IE! Instead!

Take! That! Google!

Conflicted 

By Mycho
Posted Friday 8th February 2008 11:31 GMT
Gates Horns

Part of me says no, never. search.yahoo.com is better than google because it's less easily vandalised to make idiot return George Bush or the whole French Military Victories thing. Yahoo Messenger is just better than other IM clients which don't support things like offline messaging.

That said, we're talking most of a year's net revenue for Microsoft. Buying Yahoo and it failing could really hurt them.

So, keep off my Yahoo or choke on it? I'm not sure of my feelings.

Ick 

By Spleen
Posted Friday 8th February 2008 12:57 GMT

Well I'm not an expert Wall Street analyst - I left my roulette wheel at home - but I doubt that Microsoft will raise its bid. It's very unlikely that anyone will launch a counterbid, and the only other reason Microsoft might have to increase its offer - Yahoo flat out refusing to sell - also seems improbable, as Yahoo doesn't really have anywhere else to go. And the deal may not even happen. If you buy Yahoo shares on the basis that Microsoft will pay more than $31 each, it's a gamble, and one probably less safe than sticking it on red.

Re: conflicted 

By Dam
Posted Friday 8th February 2008 16:21 GMT

You fail, to be honest.

"Yahoo Messenger is just better than other IM clients which don't support things like offline messaging."

Or is it ?

I mean... ICQ much ? Welcome to 8-9 years ago ? Offline message from day one ?

If you're going to make claims, get them right first please.

This is not mentionning the fact that (crappy, granted) Live Messenger does support offline messaging...

Please explain 

By Martin
Posted Friday 8th February 2008 16:29 GMT
Dead Vulture

I must be really stupid today. Please reconcile these three statements.

1) Yahoo shares are worth more than Microsoft offered for them

2) Microsoft offered $31

3) Yahoo shares are $29.

Can I go and work in the Stock Market, please?

Offline messaging 

By Geoff Mackenzie
Posted Friday 8th February 2008 16:57 GMT

I use SMTP and POP3 for that.

Offline messaging 

By Mycho
Posted Friday 8th February 2008 22:39 GMT

Windows Live supports sending IMs to people who are offline? When did that get added?

RE: Please explain 

By Jaime Giussi
Posted Saturday 9th February 2008 03:46 GMT
Alien

That is because microsoft didn't offer $31 in plain money. Microsoft offered a mix of its own shares and cash equivalent to $31 for each Yahoo! share. But now that Yahoo!'s stock has climbed, the offer isn't so good, specially because Microsoft's stock fell 14%. I hope this has helped you understand the economics behind Microsoft's offer. Have a good one!

  • Microsoft System Center - Designed For Big
  • Meet the fast-growing demand for notebooks with HP
  • Find out how to eradicate 99.7% of spam, click here
  • From small embedded OS to the world's most used open mobile OS
whitepaper title

Server Consolidation and Containment

This paper discusses how consolidation and containment solutions with a virtual infrastructure meet the challenges of server sprawl and underutilization..
whitepaper title

Making Green IT a Reality

Customer Perspectives on the Impact of Storage Vendor Decisions on Power, Cooling, & Space in Enterprise Data Centers.

Top 20 storiesAll The Week’s HeadlinesArchiveSearch