The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Hollywood writers abandon Hollywood for web

Google licks its chops

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Unhappy with the way they've been treated by Hollywood's old school film and television producers, more than a few big name American movie and TV writers are bootstrapping startups in an effort to distribute their own material. And naturally, they plan on distributing via the web.

As American TV addicts know all too well, the Writers Guild of America is nearly three months into an epic strike against Hollywood's film and TV producers, and though there are rumblings that this walkout will soon end, it's already spawned at least three new writer-driven ventures intent on using the good ol' internet to bypass the traditional studios.

One such venture is Virtual Artists, a company that bills itself as a marriage of "A-list writers from Hollywood" and "A-list writers of free/open source software."

The Hollywood A-listers include Neal Baer, whose credits include TV extravaganzas Law & Order: SVU, ER, and China Beach; Susannah Grant, whose credits include the feature films Erin Brockovitch, Charlotte's Web, and Pocahontas; John Logan, a writer on Sweeney Todd, The Aviator, and Gladiator; and Ron Bass, an Oscar winner whose credits include Rain Man, Joy Luck Club, My Best Friend's Wedding.

But seasoned Reg readers will be much more impressed with the open source types, including Brian Behlendorf, founder of the Apache Project, and Henry Poole, a Free Software Foundation board member.

Like similar ventures, such as Hollywood Disrupted and Founders Media Group, Virtual Artists is a direct result of the writer's strike. Another founding member, Aaron Mendelson, co-creator of the Air Bud franchise, serves on the board of the Writer's Guild and is part of the strike's negotiating committee.

While working on Witness, a human-rights video site backed by pop singer Peter Gabriel, Henry Poole was introduced to Mendelson. "Aaron told me about what had been going on with the writers and I described what I was trying to do online," Poole says. "And eventually, many of the writers decided to come together to form their own studio.

"There's a real interest in exploring different business models online. The traditional business model is dying in its current form, so the writers want to explore a new field." The writer's guild is striking in part to receive better pay when the old school media companies send their their films and TV shows across the net.

How will new ventures like Virtual Artist leverage the net? That's yet to be seen. Virtual Artists will likely build its own video site, but it's exploring other avenues as well. "We're definitely working on our own infrastructure," Poole explains, "but we're also looking at distribution to other sites."

Whatever they end up doing, they'll end up doing it with open source software. Poole is adamant that the big studios have so far been unable to leverage the power of the web, because they don't understand how online software works. "On the internet, the rules are different. The studios don't understand yet how to play in this space where you have a million screens to launch something on, rather than 1000 screens - where you have hundreds of thousands of network hubs and hundreds of thousands of individuals who have tremendous influence, rather than just a few cable operators.

"They're used to doing things the old way, and they don't really know to make money on the internet."

The fledgling company is looking at three broad categories of free software. "One is distribution systems, including peer-to-peer distribution," Poole says. "But we're also looking for developers and maintainers of software packages that enable collaboration. And the third category is community building. As developers have worked in community software projects, we're quite interested opening up a new way for audiences to related to creators."

The Reg supports any effort to bypass the traditional media giants. But our worry is that, as they attempt to build their own web-based distribution companies, writers and other artists will simply end up in the pocket of new-age corporate behemoths like Google, Apple, Amazon, and YaMicrohoosoft!.

Yes, the web allows for self-distribution. But it isn't hard to envision a web where you can't make money from online video unless you sell your soul to the giants of the internet. Google owns YouTube. Apple runs iTunes. And so often, when independent services gain a little traction, they get gobbled up in much the same way YouTube was gobbled up by Google. Just last month, Amazon's Internet Movie Database (IMDb) subsidiary ate the indie film site Withoutabox.

Are web-minded film and TV writers trading one evil for another? ®

Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime

Latest Comments

Collectivism != Socialism

Many readers of this article seem to confuse collectivism with socialism. The two may seem similar on the surface, but there is a crucial difference: Collectivism is voluntary, socialism is not. The writer's union is no more socialist than the corporations its members work for (but both are collectivist). No writer is forced to be a member of the union; every writer is free to leave the union and negotiate on his/her own terms. However, most writers reckon they have more bargaining power if they bargain collectively. Compulsury union membership, now that would be socialist...

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Good on 'em

I agree with The Reg that the writers form their own distribution or publishing company on the net. The studios were balking at negotiating a measly 3.5% for writers for revenue for internet distribution, so good on 'em. Yeah sure there's always gonna be bigger fish eating smaller fish, but so what, we all know business is business.

0
0

Transubstantiation ....... Turing Tempest Tested and BetaTesting Live.

"re : amfM - Mad Hatters Tea Parties

By Anonymous Coward

Posted Tuesday 5th February 2008 22:45 GMT

Coat

"Er, I know it's from amanfromMars, but I feel obliged to point out that it was actually the March Hare's tea party. The Mad Hatter and dormouse were simply his guests." ...... re : amfM - Mad Hatters Tea Parties By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 5th February 2008 22:45 GMT

Crikey, AC, that is just Perfect, for there was bound to be something missing from the Board Meetings producing such Chaos.... the Missing IntelAIgents Link.

One wonders what they have been Using instead for it hasn't been Brains. Probably some Dumb Cold Machine in Blue Genes rather than some Hot Rock Chicks in Blue Jeans. ...........for Perfect Chipsets.

0
0

More from The Register

Microsoft to open Windows Stores inside 600 Best Buy locations
Product showcases 'must be seen to be believed'
 breaking news
BBC-featured call centre slapped with hefty fine for unwanted calls
PPI pests: Swansea-based firm stung for £225k by ICO
Author Iain (M) Banks falls to cancer at 59
Misses the release of his final work
 breaking news
What did the Lehman Brothers implosion look like to a techie?
Insider tells all about the Gnab Gib at Lehmans
It's official: 'tweet' an English word – not just in the avian sense
If the Oxford English Dictionary says it is so, then it is so
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
1-in-10 e-tomes 'are self-published'... most are 'rubbish' says book ed
Publishing man scoffs at go-it-alone writers, ursines still fouling in forests
 breaking news
Facebook RSS reader said to uncloak June 20
Secret event scooped by Scottish developer?