Feeds

FTC and DoJ will fight for the right to rule on YaMicrohoosoft!

Online ads vs. Windows scrap

!!!!! Would YaMicrohoosoft! hamper market competition? If Jerry Yang finally agrees to be swallowed by Steve Ballmer, that's a question for regulators in the US as well as the EU. But first, another question needs answering: Which US regulator will review the acquisition: the Department of Justice (DoJ) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)?

"There will likely be an arm-wrestling contest between the Justice Department and the FTC on this," says Mark Ostrau, co-chair of the antitrust and unfair competition group at the Silicon Valley law firm Fenwick & West. "Both have claims to this in one way or another."

The FTC typically handles deals in the online advertising market. It just reviewed Google's acquisition of online-ad firm DoubleClick. But the DoJ is, shall we say, more familiar with Microsoft.

In 1998, the Department of Justice joined 19 US states and the District of Columbia in filing antitrust lawsuits against the Redmond software giant over its Windows operating system and applications, and ever since settling with Microsoft in 2002, the DoJ has monitored the company's business operations in accordance with an antitrust consent decree.

If Yahoo! approves the proposed $44.6bn deal, the two regulators will sit down at the bargaining table to determine which one is better equipped to review it.

"There is a clearance process between the two agencies so that they never look at the same transaction," says Howard Morse, a former assistant director of the bureau of competition at the FTC and now a co-chair of the anti-trust practice at the stateside law firm Drinker, Biddle & Reath.

Whichever regulator tackles the task, the other may provide assistance. "There have been very rare situations where there's been some sharing of expertise, where staff of one agency was 'on loan' to the other," explains Ostrau. "And this could be one of those rare occurrences."

But as we see it, the DoJ should take the lead, since the issues at hand outstrip the FTC's traditional online ad-watching domain.

If Yahoo! and Microsoft merge, their combined online ad operation still wouldn't match the one headquartered in Mountain View. Google controls 60 per cent of the search market, and DoubleClick, which Google will buy as soon as regulators let it, is by far the dominant player in the display ad market.

"Right now, you have one player that owns the market: Google," says Ted Henneberry, co-chair of the European practice group at the international law firm Heller Ehrman, who's dealt with anti-trust issues on both sides of the Atlantic.

But a Yahoo!-Microsoft deal would extend well beyond the online ad market. "There would be concern with significant consolidation in a number of areas," says Ostrau. "There's certainly the advertising market, including search advertising and other areas of online advertising. But we're also talking about consolidating two web-based email systems, two online communities, and so on."

The big question is whether Microsoft would gain an unfair advantage by dovetailing Windows with Yahoo!'s search and ad technologies. "There is a potential for Microsoft to leverage its operating system," says Ostrau.

Couldn't Microsoft pull this trick with its home-grown online technologies? Of course. Google has specifically asked to the DoJ to prevent Redmond from doing so. But this becomes an even bigger issue if Microsoft acquires Yahoo!

"When Internet Explorer was first used with Windows, it wasn't that good. People still used Netscape," says Ostrau. "But once Internet Explorer was good enough, the bundling had a big effect. It's one thing to put MSN search on Windows. It's another to put Yahoo! on there too. The more attractive a technology, the more effective the bundle."

Clearly, this is a job for the DoJ.

Let's just hope they can keep a straight face. First, the DoJ slaps Microsoft for monopolistic practices in the operating system market. Then Microsoft complains that Google is threatening to build a monopoly in acquiring DoubleClick. And then it turns around and tries to acquire Yahoo!, an acquisition that makes the Google-DoubleClick deal look piddling.

"Every company is guilty of talking out of both sides of their mouth," says Ostrau. "But regulators understand that."

Bootnote

And then there's the bigger question: If Microsoft acquires Yahoo!, what happens to The Register's Yahoo! headlines? ®

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Apple CEO Tim Cook: TV is TERRIBLE and stuck in the 1970s
The iKing thinks telly is far too fiddly and ugly – basically, iTunes
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.