IT tackles benefit cheats
You've been Fraimed
Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime
Technology is helping catch benefits cheats but there are doubts about a key case management system, according to a new report by the National Audit Office (NAO)
In Progress in tackling benefit fraud, the NAO praises the government's record in reducing fraud from an estimated £2bn in 2000-01 to £800m in 2006-07. The significant drop has been achieved through IT initiatives including data matching and the National Benefit Fraud Hotline, it says.
The NAO's last report on the subject in 2003 expressed concerns about the management information available to the Department for Work and Pensions. It said the department used a number of different IT systems, all of which required manual input and that these systems were not integrated and were often regionally based. Rekeying of data was leading to delays and errors.
Action taken by the department since then includes developing a more intelligence led approach to countering fraud, using a tool called Frisc (Fraud Referral and Intelligence Scoring Card) to prioritise cases.
In 2007 it started the roll out of a new case management system, Fraims (Fraud Referral and Intervention Management System), aimed at speeding up case management processes. Full roll out was expected by October 2007, but is now being staggered over a longer period "to take account of the complexity of the system". It should be in place by March 2008 and will have cost £65m.
Although it can streamline fraud case management, the NAO says Fraims does not, however, cover all of the lifecycle of cases.
For example, it does not support the counter-fraud activities of prosecutions and debt management. Due to the long delays in the project, there is scepticism among counter-fraud staff about how effective the system will be in delivering the expected improvements, such as documenting old case information.
NAO head Sir John Bourn said: "The Department for Work and Pensions has made tackling benefit fraud a priority and has made good progress in reducing fraud, which represents a substantial achievement by its staff. It is also ahead of other comparable countries in its measurement and understanding of benefit fraud."
Bourn also said the department's specific counter fraud activities cost £154m during 2006-07 and identified £106m of overpaid benefits. Although some of the department's initiatives lead to earlier interception of overpayments and may deter potential fraudsters, he said the department could do more to determine whether its activities are cost-effective.
This article was originally published at Kablenet.
Kablenet's GC weekly is a free email newsletter covering the latest news and analysis of public sector technology. To register click here.
COMMENTS
Deja vu
I am reminded of a report in Computer World many years about detecting benefit fraud. The states of Ohio & Pennsylvania have a common boundary, and decided to data match their welfare recipient lists in the adjacent counties to catch double-dippers living close to the line.
The published an article in which the IT director in one state gushed away about this wonderful program that had cost $1,000,000 to implement -- and, it turned out, not unearthed a single cheat.
Someone pointed out in a followup letter (remember those? something like comments on El Reg) that the cost benefit ratio was pretty bad; in fact, it was infinite.
The situation under discussion has an eerie resemblance to that ancient report. Nothing ever changes.
@ John Macintyre
"to sack all the incompetent fuckwits"
They'd have no-one left if they did that.
Protesting too much
Benefit cheats are, of course, the scum of the earth. Not because benefit cheating makes you the scum of the earth, but because the scum of the earth, unsurprisingly, tend to benefit cheat - most of the reported cases seem to be local councillors, drug dealers and other criminals.
That said, the shrill tone of the government "campaign" on benefit cheating gets really annoying really fast. I'm particularly thinking of the fantastically Orwellian "we're watching you" campaign of a few years' back. I seem to remember the TV adverts had "benefit cheats" going about their lives while being followed around by a big target sign representing the government. I'm not sure whether that was before or after the police demonstrated at Stockwell what exactly the consequences of the state following you around with a big target sign are. It was accompanied by Stasi-esque entreaties to grass up your neighbours.
The government would of course like us to believe that benefit cheats are stealing money from you, the taxpayer. This outwardly makes sense but is of course BollockS with a capital B and S. The money has already been stolen from you, by the government. If the money is stolen from the taxpayers, did the government return to them the £1.2bn it supposedly clawed back from the cheats (that's £41.38 for each of us)? Did it f***.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud based data management
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
