The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Star Trek XI teaser trailer beams onto web

Swish 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 12:49 GMT

Thumb Up

Bring it! :-D

Kudos 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 12:51 GMT

Boffin

...for posting this on Reg Hardware!

beam me up.. 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:12 GMT

its so .. dirty when was the future dirty?

Odd Numbered Trek Films 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:14 GMT

Dead Vulture

Stink. This one doesn't look like its going to break the trend.

of course... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:14 GMT

... it could still suck donkey balls...

btw wrath of khan was the best one

(quickly zips up astebos suit)

Simon Pegg... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:18 GMT

Happy

... I couldn't care less whether his accent was authentic or not - I'd pay good money to watch the man read out his shopping list...

Oh Goody 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:24 GMT

Thumb Up

Nothing quite like a good star trek movie :)

I shall be dragging the missus along to watch this one. Revenge time, I was forced to endure Pride and Prejudice.

If that really is the future... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:29 GMT

Stop

Surely the Enterprise should be shown being constructed in a Chinese, Indian, or S.Korean space dock?

Re:If that really is the future... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:38 GMT

Just to be a star trek fan for a moment the Enterprise was constructed according to its dedication Plaques at San Francisco yards

@AC 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:40 GMT

In the future the Chinese, Indians and S.Koreans own the world and outsource the dirty low-paid dangerous work to Western nations. Fair turnabout.

Not a Space Dock 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:45 GMT

That's not a space dock! It's the shipyards in San Fransico.

Unless they're re-writing the whole lot - plus Kirk takes command of the ship some 20 years after it's maiden voyage.

Roll on the rest of the geeks...

What... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:46 GMT

Alert

...will the Klingons look like this time? Little Chinese/Mongoloid men from the original series or the beasts from TNG onwards.

Before you answer remember your ST history, and the inconsistent piffle that it is the Star Trek universe. WhyTF didn't they hire consistancy checkers?

I may watch this but the very, very first hint of 20th/21st century Political Correctness, inconsistancy or any un-Science Fiction "let's play baseball on the holodeck for this full episode" nonsense, I am am out of there faster than you can say "what a lot of bollocks"

Scotty's accent 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 13:52 GMT

Thumb Up

***"and for a moment we forget that Simon Pegg couldn't even do an authentic American accent in Band of Brothers so how on Earth is he going to take on a thick Lowland Scottish accent..."***

And, for a moment, we forget that James Doohan's Scottish accent wasn't exactly authentic.

If Pegg's faux Scottish accent matches Doohan's faux Scottish then consistency is preserved......

@ android 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:06 GMT

Thumb Up

"... it could still suck donkey balls...

btw wrath of khan was the best one

(quickly zips up astebos suit)"

Displaying two different types of suicidal tendency in a short three line post must surely be a record. ;)

Ret-con galore. 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:08 GMT

Thumb Down

Don't mess with TOS.

Not looking forward to this at all.

/old school Trekkie.

JJ Abrams... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:09 GMT

Stop

has a host of 2nd rate US TV shows and MI 3 to his credit. Oh dear...

Spock's Mum was human... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:09 GMT

Happy

So they're getting Winona Ryder to play her. Because, you know, if Spock's Mum was Vulcan, they'd have had to get a Vulcan to play her :-)

Andrew

Re: odd-numbered Trek 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:22 GMT

They broke the "even = any good whatsoever" meme with the last Trek, so maybe this one can avoid the "odd = rubbish" one?

who do i need to talk to to get that last minute and 30 back 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:29 GMT

Stop

ok that trailer was a total waste of my life. who do i have to beat to get that time back...

Oh dear - re-font-ing 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:31 GMT

Notice the lettering on the dish section, they've changed the lettering font.

Oh dear, a Thunderbirds (Jonathan Frakes dir.) remake here we come.

If they change the shape of the Enterprise to make it more 'noughties' - my letter of disgust goes straight off to Abrams!

Next we'll see certain 60s actor mimmicking the likes not seen since the god awful New-Voyages (google it) remakes. It will never look right having Kirk played by somebody else, even if done well - you'll see, it's just awkward and embarassing.

I for one have yet to be wow'd by all this.

This'll be rubbish 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:37 GMT

Thumb Down

ST fans won't stand the entire story being rewritten and all the previous TV shows and films being ignored.

All else aside.... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:40 GMT

Happy

There's one very good reason for fans to be optimistic - they have stuck with the original design or the Enterprise, the Pre re-fit constitution class (frankly an ugly ship!) when they could have gone all over the place.

I'll go see it in the cinema regardless ;)

If you want more Startrek... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 14:54 GMT

Coat

Why wait till December to see new Startrek. Checkout this Startrek/

Starwars fan film me and a couple of mates made last year. It's certainly better than "Nemesis", although not as good as "Wrath of khan". We have Klingons in our film and they look like Beasts.

http://www.stage6.com/user/Straitjacket2007/video/1776270/A-Tale-of-Two-Galaxies-Part-1

If you don't like Startrek, flame away and I'll get my coat and Beam my ass back to the mother ship.

Re: Oh Goody 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 15:46 GMT

Thumb Up

heh... I'll probably get dragged to see this one by the missus.

she grew up watching ALL the treks with her father. she's actually more into star trek than I am. works well for me!

Re: Oh dear - re-font-ing 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 15:58 GMT

Paris Hilton

So you're OK with a different actor playing Kirk, but they use a different frickin' font and you're up in arms?!!?!?!?!!!

IT'S

NOT

REAL!

(PH for, y'know, obvious reasons)

Space dock? 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 16:52 GMT

It better not be in a space dock, or they have some 'splainin to do about those welding sparks falling, almost as if they're in a gravitational field.

And they're wearing space suits, but in a hard vacuum you wouldn't see welding sparks like that because there's no oxygen to cause the sparks to burn (oxidize).

But, even with an incorrect font (hey, at least it isn't Trajan) I'm sure I'll go see it. Hell, I paid to see Nemesis even after I'd been warned off.

@Space dock? 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 17:50 GMT

Flame

Don't we all want Comic Sans with drop shadows?

Can't wait 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 18:34 GMT

Happy

I'm literally nursing a semi based on the trailer alone...

As to all the "it's not in the San Fransisco dock", everyone knows that teaser trailers contain next to none of the actual film material.

...it's as if the Russians never existed... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 18:34 GMT

Thumb Down

Hello, it wasn't the Americans who made the only major expeditions into space, y'know?

"The eyes of the world now look into Space" (JFK)

"Godspeed, John Glenn"

"The Eagle has landed"

"Just one small step for man..."

Not even a beep from Sputnik, ffs. :rolleyes:

@AC 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 20:03 GMT

Well of course if you included European contribution to space exploration history it would be...

... nice firework display, shame about the payload...

Sadly 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 22:36 GMT

Paris Hilton

Sadly as always due to the sheer number of trekkies even a dog of a movie will boom at the box office and go onto sell a gazillion Dvd's , Blue crap or any other high def format you choose !

Ah I can just see Paris rolling her eyes at this turkey !

But when are we getting a "Lindsay Lohan" replacement icon ? :)

Sheer Crap 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 22:44 GMT

Stop

What the Trek franchise needs is some ONE at the helm who understands and loves it - and for more than the few minutes preceeding the press release announcing the hire.

Someone who can prove they've been a fan for at least 10 years or more would be a start.

Boutique directors who are going to try and turn Trek into something else are a terrible sign. Rehashing the past is foolish; it turns into an absolute nightmare of retconning and timeline management.

I suspect this film will wind up being hated even more than Star Trek Nemesis - and that's saying something.

The geek in me... 

Posted Tuesday 22nd January 2008 23:30 GMT

Boffin

... feels obliged to question, why do the warp nessels have what looks like an air turbine at the front? Not only that, spinning the wrong way??

Wait for TV.... 

Posted Wednesday 23rd January 2008 08:08 GMT

Personally I won't even rent it, when it appears on one of the movie channels I might waste a couple of hours of my life watching it, but that's all they'll get from me.

@BoldMan 

Posted Wednesday 23rd January 2008 09:06 GMT

Quote: "Well of course if you included European contribution to space exploration history it would be...

... nice firework display, shame about the payload..."

You seem to be ignoring the fact that the USA had to 'hire' a German Nazi to get their space program off the ground.

As if ST:X wasn't bad enough... 

Posted Wednesday 23rd January 2008 13:09 GMT

Thumb Up

They've now making us wait nearly a WHOLE DAMN YEAR for ST:-1

Although cannon states that this version of the ship was built at the San Fransisco yards, it's always been taken that the yard was in orbit in the nearest slot of the clarke belt, rather than actually on the ground.

On the plus side, this can't be any worse than Nemesis. (And since Terrorists are evil these days, there's no way they'd ever get a budget to make a DS9 movie!)

I heard Lindsey Lohan will be in this... 

Posted Wednesday 23rd January 2008 14:22 GMT

Boffin

She plays Picard after an accident in the transporter involving some chronoton particals and a lot of Oestrogen.

Seriously, I will be watching this when it comes out, I can't believe Star Trek fans are fussing about continuity, its Sci Fi, there doesn't need to be continuity as everything can be explained by quantum singularities and parallel universes.

I mean why is it that in Undiscoverred Country it is the Excelsior that is tracking Gasious Anomolies at the start of the film and the Enterprise that is carrying the equipment to do so at the end?

@Tim Lane 

Posted Wednesday 23rd January 2008 15:52 GMT

Stop

Because the Excelsior wasn't the only ship involved in the survey?

(I hate myself so much for havng wasted an entire day of my addolesence reading the ST:VI novelisation and finding that out.)

Well... 

Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 14:46 GMT

Coat

The good news is that, with any luck at all, the movie will go soup to nuts without Braga and Berman ever having been in any way associated with it. That in and of itself raises it above the last few movies.

The bad news is that everybody knows you should never say "it can't possibly get any worse"; the Great Bird of the Galaxy shites mightily upon those who so presume.

This will probably be better than ST:TMP, possibly even as good as Generations. I'm not holding my breath for it to get any better than that - especially after seeing Cloverfield.

@Jeff Dickey 

Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 22:58 GMT

Go

No Braga? Can you promise? Do you cross your heart and hope to die? Do you swear on your uplink's lifespan?

Please oh please oh please, bragga is the single worst thing ever to happen to ST since, ever.

Music 

Posted Sunday 27th January 2008 07:40 GMT

Thumb Up

If the music is half as good as the soundtrack from First Contact I will be happy to sit through it with my eyes closed :)

Don’t Miss