Feeds

Investors shred Intel over double-digit Q4 gains

Fear is in the share

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Intel today turned in record fourth quarter revenue and then saw investors pummel its share price in after-hours trading. Thank for the effort, guys.

The chip maker posted an 11 per cent rise in revenue to $10.7bn. It also kicked net income higher by a whopping 51 per cent to $2.3bn. But these flashy figures fell below the midpoint of Intel's previous guidance and below analysts' expectations, leaving already rattled investors with the motivation to sell.

At the time of writing, Intel's shares - down 1.7 per cent during regular trading - had tumbled more than 14 per cent to $19.52.

During the fourth quarter, sales of Intel's server and desktop chips rose to $4.3bn from $3.9bn in the same period last year. Chipset and motherboard revenue rose as well to $1.4bn.

Sales of notebook chips edged higher to $3.0bn from $2.7bn as mobile chipset sales jumped to $1.1bn from $925m.

In addition to missing the high-end of previous guidance, Intel seemed to spook investors with its outlook for the coming year. The company expects first quarter revenue between $9.4bn and $10bn. In the 2007 first quarter, Intel reported revenue of $8.9bn.

We read Intel CEO Paul Otellini's comments made during a conference call as far less pessimistic than other media types appear to have taken them.

Everyone in the US is gripped with fear over a supposed impending recession and seems ready to take any hesitation about the macroeconomic situation as proof that the end is near.

For example, one analyst claimed that Otellini voiced "concerns" about the US economy, appearing to almost want the statement to be true.

"I don't think I said 'I have concerns,'" Otellini countered. "I said I have the same caution as everyone in America who watches (financial news on TV)."

He confirmed concerns about the US capital markets but said he "just doesn't see" these worries hurting sales of technology products at the moment.

Overall, Otellini put forward the idea that Intel has a very watchful eye on the economies here and abroad but that sales of chips have been moving along just fine. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Don't wait for that big iPad, order a NEXUS 9 instead, industry little bird says
Google said to debut next big slab, Android L ahead of Apple event
Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
The Fourth Amendment... and it IS better
Microsoft to enter the STRUGGLE of the HUMAN WRIST
It's not just a thumb war, it's total digit war
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
A drone of one's own: Reg buyers' guide for UAV fanciers
Hardware: Check. Software: Huh? Licence: Licence...?
The Apple launch AS IT HAPPENED: Totally SERIOUS coverage, not for haters
Fandroids, Windows Phone fringe-oids – you wouldn't understand
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.