The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

i-mate denies putting itself on the market

i-mate, your mate, anyone's mate

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Windows Mobile device manufacturer i-mate has denied rumours that the company is up for sale, but admits having a "strategic review" of the options given the lacklustre performance of the last 12 months.

This morning the FT reported that i-mate was on the market following a profits warning from the company, attributed to delayed chip deliveries and the fact that some devices couldn't be sold in the US thanks to a supplier losing a patent battle.

As far as we know only one chip manufacturer has recently lost a patent battle to such an extent that their technology cannot be imported into the US - so it would seem that Qualcomm is to blame for at least some of i-mate's problems.

But it's not been a good year for the company, which seemed to overextend its reach in attempting to launch too many models which then got delayed, and in some cases still aren't available. ®

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Latest Comments
Anonymous Coward

Clearing the Air...

I-mate is a OEM, and not truly a manufactuer, but you would be suprised to see all the comapnies that don't do their own manufacturing these days. That being said, they haven't had ties with HTC for a couple of years, and that undoubtedly has hurt them financially. I work in the industry and have seen their new designs that are tuly theirs and they look nice with incredible specs, but I just haven't seen any of them on the market as of yet. I would like to see them succeed, to give HTC some competition and keep the technology state of the art.

0
0

Not a manufacturer

Yep they mostly use HTC products, mostly (Newt in Aliens + the South Park parody of it).

iMate were in that stupid business position anyway, I got hold of all my HTC models over the years (cant remember the HTC 'codenames') via both Orange and T-Mobile for a fraction of the price iMate charged for the equivalent model and without the mobile contract.

Okay maybe I paid equivalent cost for it in the long run via the mob provider monthly fees, but that financial kick in the teeth was absorbed IYKWIM, and it meant that iMate didn't get a look in for the majority of all sales - as I said, positioned poorly.

0
0

Correct me if I'm wrong...

but isn't i-mate a re-brander, not a manufacturer?

0
0

More from The Register

1,000 O2 staff chose redundancy over Capita
Betrayal, or just decent terms?
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
 breaking news
Pttow! Ofcom kicks hams out of MoD bands
Geet off my land, you, you ... 'secondary user'
 breaking news
Now you can use your phone instead of your wallet at the ATM, too
Blimey, these little paper towels out of the vending machine are really expensive
 breaking news
UK.gov's £530m bumpkin broadband rollout: 'Train crash waiting to happen'
Whitehall whispers of damning watchdog report next month
 breaking news
MySpace zaps millions of teens' tearful rants, causes wave of angst
'Your crappy redesign SUCKS, I wanna read my blogs' screech users
 breaking news
Microsoft Office 365 on iPhone NOW: No, we're not making this up
Word, Excel, Powerpoint for your pocket-stroker
 breaking news
EU signs off on eCall emergency-phone-in-every-car plan
GPS and a mobe in every car - do you suppose the NSA would fancy that?