Feeds

Spam King Ralsky indicted over stock spam scam

Pump and dump gang raked in millions

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Notorious spammer Alan Ralsky and ten others have been indicted in the US over the alleged use of junk mail to promote stock fraud scams.

Ralsky (a long term fixture in Spamhaus's list of known spammers) his son-in-law Scott K Bradley and others, including a dual national of Canada and Hong Kong and individuals from Russia, California, Michigan, and Arizona have been charged over the alleged fraud.

The charges stem from a three-year investigation - led by agents from the FBI, with assistance from the US Postal Inspection Service and the Internal Revenue Service - into a "sophisticated and extensive" spamming operation promoting a "pump and dump" scheme. The defendants sent spam touting thinly-traded Chinese penny stocks in a bid to drive up their stock price over the short term and sell at a profit before the inevitable crash and burn.

Investigators reckon the defendants earned around $3m during the summer of 2005 alone as a result of their illegal spamming activities. The types of products and services that the defendants pitched evolved over time, as did the types of illegal spamming techniques they employed.

According to the indictment, the defendants used various illegal methods to distribute the spam, including the use of proxy computers (ie botnet clients) to relay junk mail and the use of falsified headers in email messages. The content of the email messages was also filled with porkies.

The indictment alleges that the defendants earned profits when recipients responded to the spam and purchased the touted products and services. How Wai John Hui, 49, of Vancouver, Canada and Hong Kong, allegedly acted as a link between the spammers and their Chinese contacts. How was arrested in New York on Wednesday. Two other defendants - Scott K Bradley, 46, of West Bloomfield, Michigan, and Judy M Devenow, 55, of Lansing, Michigan - appeared in court on Thursday. The remaining defendants are being sought for questioning.

The defendants are variously charged with several federal criminal offenses, including conspiracy, offences against US anti-spam legislation (the CAN SPAM Act), computer fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering.

A full list of defendants can be found in a DoJ statement of the case here. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Who.is does the Harlem Shake
Blame it on LOLing XSS terroristas
Researchers tell black hats: 'YOU'RE SOOO PREDICTABLE'
Want to register that domain? We're way ahead of you.
Stunned by Shellshock Bash bug? Patch all you can – or be punished
UK data watchdog rolls up its sleeves, polishes truncheon
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
SHELLSHOCKED: Fortune 1000 outfits Bash out batches of patches
CloudPassage points to 'pervasive' threat of Bash bug
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.