Skip to content
By Alan Posted Saturday 29th December 2007 22:13 GMT
If the site has no exploits, how can it be called malicious ? Surely this is libel. Just because others break the law, doesn't mean we can ignore it. And the title of the article is wrong in that respect also. Maybe it should read : "New Years Eve greetings fail to disguise non-existent Storm Worm attacks", or "New Years Eve greetings innocent". Maybe F-Secure have another agenda (ya think ?). Think terrorism.
If the site has no exploits, how can it be called malicious ?
Surely this is libel.
Just because others break the law, doesn't mean we can ignore it.
And the title of the article is wrong in that respect also. Maybe it should read :
"New Years Eve greetings fail to disguise non-existent Storm Worm attacks", or
"New Years Eve greetings innocent".
Maybe F-Secure have another agenda (ya think ?).
Think terrorism.
Open-sourcers put locks on keys
Vista lessons not learned
democrats.org co-opted
Review Tough enough?
Comments on: New Year's Eve greetings disguise Storm Worm attacks
malicious ? #
By Alan Posted Saturday 29th December 2007 22:13 GMT