The Register®

Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: New Year's Eve greetings disguise Storm Worm attacks

malicious ? 

Posted Saturday 29th December 2007 22:13 GMT

If the site has no exploits, how can it be called malicious ?

Surely this is libel.

Just because others break the law, doesn't mean we can ignore it.

And the title of the article is wrong in that respect also. Maybe it should read :

"New Years Eve greetings fail to disguise non-existent Storm Worm attacks", or

"New Years Eve greetings innocent".

Maybe F-Secure have another agenda (ya think ?).

Think terrorism.

Don’t Miss

Warning: roadworksNetbooks and Mini-Laptops

Buyer's Guide They're little and we love 'em. But which ones are best?

SSL covers security embarrassments with EV figleaf

Whitepaper Helping you know scammers from Adam

Emails show journalist rigged Wikipedia's naked shorts

Overstock's Byrne vindicated amidst economic meltdown

Warning StopYours truly, angry mob

Book extract Bringing Nothing To The Party: Cleaning up the net, one satirical vigilante page at a time