Most read
Popular Whitepapers
- Avoiding 7 common mistakes of IT security compliance
Help your company achieve compliance - Server-gated cryptography
Providing better security for more users - Airport insecurity: the case of lost laptops
Research and key findings - The best practices guide for application security
The comprehensive business guide to application security (part 3) - The security implications of Web 2.0
Exposing and overcoming the vulnerabilities - Vulnerability management buyer's checklist
Key questions to ask before you select a VM solution




Win a Samsung C6625!
Is your cameraphone an oxymoron?
Reg Mobile and Wireless newsletter is go! go! go!
Sign up, sign up for The Register IT security newsletter
Comments on: Wishing you an EMF-free Christmas
the rules #
By The Mighty Spang Posted Friday 21st December 2007 23:20 GMT
*snork* #
By BitTwister Posted Friday 21st December 2007 23:59 GMT
The real effect of EMF #
By Captain DaFt Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 00:15 GMT
Hah. #
By David Wiernicki Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 04:44 GMT
Err #
By Darryl Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 04:58 GMT
I thought the real effect of EMF was... #
By Damian Gabriel Moran Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 05:19 GMT
Tasers? #
By Andrew Tyler Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 06:18 GMT
Taser proof clothes? #
By Flocke Kroes Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 06:33 GMT
Radiation Protectors #
By Jon Axtell Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 09:03 GMT
screening a GSM #
By David Shaw Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 10:29 GMT
Bit of science... #
By Bracken Dawson Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 11:34 GMT
JD #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 11:43 GMT
Gullibles Travels #
By Keith T Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 12:46 GMT
Radiation protector spam, above. #
By Sean Ellis Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 14:13 GMT
@Jon Axtell #
By pctechxp Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 15:42 GMT
O RLY? #
By Gilbert Wham Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 16:03 GMT
re: JD #
By Kanhef Posted Saturday 22nd December 2007 21:30 GMT
We've got it wrong! #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Sunday 23rd December 2007 00:19 GMT
Re:re: JD #
By Charley Posted Sunday 23rd December 2007 09:01 GMT
We probably have got it wrong #
By Clint Sharp Posted Sunday 23rd December 2007 09:47 GMT
There are enough worries... #
By Paul Bohme Posted Sunday 23rd December 2007 16:48 GMT
Re: JD #
By J Posted Monday 24th December 2007 00:59 GMT
Re: the article #
By J Posted Monday 24th December 2007 01:03 GMT
@ JD #
By Zac T Posted Monday 24th December 2007 04:10 GMT
Microwave ovens with doors off #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 24th December 2007 08:21 GMT
Are these the same people #
By Vernon Lloyd Posted Monday 24th December 2007 08:31 GMT
Re: Bit of science... #
By Ole Juul Posted Monday 24th December 2007 08:42 GMT
@vernon lloyd #
By breakfast Posted Monday 24th December 2007 10:18 GMT
It's a shame..... #
By Andy Worth Posted Monday 24th December 2007 11:30 GMT
@JD #
By Gordon Ross Posted Monday 24th December 2007 11:31 GMT
@JD #
By Mark Lockwood Posted Monday 24th December 2007 11:49 GMT
You're still all assuming that being heated is a bad thing. #
By Bracken Dawson Posted Monday 24th December 2007 17:53 GMT
@JD #
By David Posted Monday 24th December 2007 19:03 GMT
20KW MRI scanners anyone? #
By dermot Posted Monday 24th December 2007 19:31 GMT
it's this type of crap that leads many who do suffer to remain silent #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 24th December 2007 22:17 GMT
on the heating effect of microwave radiation #
By John Benson Posted Wednesday 26th December 2007 18:47 GMT
mind control, high blue eye inncidence, good old genocide all real if you ask me. #
By Luke Posted Wednesday 26th December 2007 20:33 GMT
Poll from www.welcomeangels.com (correct at time of posting) #
By Nathanael Bastone Posted Thursday 27th December 2007 10:28 GMT
Funny stuff #
By Kevin McMurtrie Posted Thursday 27th December 2007 17:11 GMT
Anonymous Coward and his MRI scan.... #
By dermot Posted Friday 28th December 2007 19:18 GMT