Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/19/ooxml_standards_row_latest/
Microsoft is facing growing criticism of its bid to have Office Open XML (OOXML) accepted as an international standard ahead of a crucial vote by the ISO scheduled for February.
Redmond initially promised that the ISO would have control of OOXML if and when it became a standard. Critics reckon (http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071206131310362) Microsoft is now backsliding on this promise via plans to retain indirect control of the standard through Ecma International, the group that originally rubber stamped OOXML.
The proposals have raised concerns that the ISO would be unable to make OOXML compatible with existing standards, leaving the ISO relegated to the role of publishing a list of errata (corrections), with Ecma left in charge.
The dispute over the oversight plans is the latest in a string of controversies over OOXML concerning allegations of vote fixing and more that wouldn't be out of place in the more heated diplomatic disputes that took place during the Cold War.
OOXML is an XML-based file format specification for documents such as word processing file, spreadsheets, and presentations. The schema was originally developed by Microsoft as a successor to previous MS Office file formats before it handed it over to Ecma International, who approved (http://www.ecma-international.org/news/PressReleases/PR_TC45_Dec2006.htm) it as a standard in December 2006.
The specification was controversially put on the fast-track to standardisation with the ISO as DIS 29500 (Draft International Standard 29500). However, a vote of the draft failed to gain sufficient approval in September, despite allegations that MS tried to manipulate the vote of national body members.
Microsoft's partners in Sweden, for example, were given "marketing incentives" in return for paying to join the national standards body. This "ballot stuffing" ploy, which Redmond claimed was down to the actions of one over zealous worker rather than company policy, backfired after Sweden invalidated (http://www.os2world.com/content/view/14874/2/) its vote because of voting iregularaties after it was discovered someone had been allowed to vote twice.
The draft specification was amended in light of criticisms and will now be resubmitted for a further standards vote. Groklaw has published an informative article (http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071211055139790&mode=nested) that highlights concerns about Redmond's possible influence on the February vote, worries about the lack of discussion over patent issues or public accountability, and a run-down on the more colourful incidents in the on-going saga.
One such allegation (http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2007071812280798) is that attempts were made to limit the number of delegates opposed to OOXML at a national standards body meeting in Portugal by limiting the number of chairs available at a conference table, excluding representatives from Sun and IBM in the process (http://wiki.ansol.org/CT-173-LDD-Meeting-002#head-97d98c9d1cc370fba533fd050ef66807b5564296).
In related office document standards news, the State of New York is entering the final days of public consultation on whether to adopt ODF (Open Document Format), a rival approach that's already been ratified by the ISO, or OOXML as a document standard.
The public consultation ends on 28 December ahead of plans by Melodie Mayberry-Stewart, New York state's chief information officer, to publish the findings on 15 January 2008. ®
Has ISO already rejected anti-OOXML appeals? (11 July 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/11/iso_rejects_ooxml_appeals/
A week in the life of Open XML (11 April 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/04/11/ooxml_protests_resolutions_ec/
Official: OOXML approved as international standard (2 April 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/02/ooxml_iso_approved/
ISO puts OOXML announcement on ice (1 April 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/01/ooxml_iso_announcement_delayed/
OOXML approved as international standard? (31 March 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/31/iso_ooxml_votes_approve/
Microsoft makes final heroic grab for OOXML votes (28 March 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/28/ooxml_iso_osp/
UK to fly the flag for OOXML (26 March 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/26/bsi_vote_yes_ooxml/
Cuba, India vote no on OOXML (25 March 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/25/ooxml_votes_india_cuba/
US gives thumbs up to OOXML for ISO standard (10 March 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/10/us_delegation_approve_ooxml/
Microsoft partners cosy up on interoperability (7 March 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/07/microsoft_interoperability_ooxml/
Google takes a swipe at OOXML (27 February 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/27/google_ooxml_blog_post/
Get some respect in data management (19 February 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/19/respect_data_management/
Bray recalls team XML (15 February 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/15/xml_tenth_anniversary/
EU investigates Microsoft's OOXML campaign (8 February 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/08/ooxml_eu_probe_iso/
Viva VBA - alas (21 January 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/21/vba_office_victory/
Microsoft puts dusty, old Office code on web (18 January 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/18/microsoft_office_binary_code/
OOXML marks the spot, says research firm (16 January 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/16/microsoft_burton_odf_xml/
OOXML vs ODF: where next for interoperability? (25 October 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/25/ooxml_vs_odf/
Google gloats over ISO's OOXML rejection (17 September 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/17/google_iso_gloat/
If you can fix a 757 with two goats, how many do you need to fix an OSI vote? (6 September 2007)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2007/09/06/channel_weekly/
SIS nixes OOXML approval (31 August 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/31/ooxml_nixed/
Microsoft accused of ballot stuffing in standards vote (29 August 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/29/microsoft_ooxml_sweeden_rigged_vote/
© Copyright 2008