Feeds

T-Mobile and 3 hook up for 3G coverage

Taking the best from both and still failing to cover the UK

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

T-Mobile and 3 are to combine their 3G radio networks in the UK, increasing coverage for both companies and reducing running costs.

The agreement follows a similar deal between Vodafone and Orange, announced earlier this year. Rather than being a coverage issue for these two operators however, the main driver was cost-reduction.

T-Mobile evolved from One-2-One, a company whose business model was based on providing coverage within London's M25, and while 3 has been busy building a 3G-only network it started a lot later than the competition. Both companies have significant holes in their 3G coverage of the UK landmass.

3 operates around 7,500 base stations, which will rise to 13,000 after the merger. This would appear to compare badly with Vodafone's 15,000 (as of January this year), but the latter includes 2G-only cells while 3 is only interested in 3G technologies.

Running separate networks made sense when companies competed on coverage, but today's customers are much more interested in the cost of calls and network reliability than if they can stay in touch from the north coast of Scotland. So combining network infrastructure makes a lot of sense.

But 3, and T-Mobile, also want the to expand their ability to offer in-home broadband. O2, Orange and Vodafone all offer ADSL connections, while T-Mobile and 3 are dependent on their 3G capability, and keen to offer mobile broadband as a competitor to fixed technologies.

The frequencies released by the switch off of analogue TV, and more flexible spectrum licensing, are going to create opportunities for new entrants in the mobile broadband market, so existing operators are going to want to make the most out of their assets while they're still worth having. ®

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

More from The Register

next story
UK fuzz want PINCODES on ALL mobile phones
Met Police calls for mandatory passwords on all new mobes
Canadian ISP Shaw falls over with 'routing' sickness
How sure are you of cloud computing now?
Don't call it throttling: Ericsson 'priority' tech gives users their own slice of spectrum
Actually it's a nifty trick - at least you'll pay for what you get
Three floats Jolla in Hong Kong: Says Sailfish is '3rd option'
Network throws hat into ring with Linux-powered handsets
Fifteen zero days found in hacker router comp romp
Four routers rooted in SOHOpelessly Broken challenge
New Sprint CEO says he will lower axe on staff – but prices come first
'Very disruptive' new rates to be revealed next week
US TV stations bowl sueball directly at FCC's spectrum mega-sale
Broadcasters upset about coverage and cost as they shift up and down the dials
Trans-Pacific: Google spaffs cash on FAST undersea packet-flinging
One of 6 backers for new 60 Tbps cable to hook US to Japan
Tech city types developing 'Google Glass for the blind' app
An app and service where other people 'see' for you
UK mobile coverage is BETTER than EVER, networks tell Ofcom
Regulator swallows this line and parrots it back out at us. What are they playing at?
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.