Facebook sues Canadian smut firm over hacking
Nice N' Sleazy
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
Facebook is suing a Canadian skin-flick firm for trying to hack into its website.
The porno outfit, which trades online under the name SlickCash, along with a number of individuals in Toronto allegedly tried to access Facebook's servers at least 200,000 times over two weeks in June. Istra Holdings Inc., a firm affiliated with SlickCash, is named alongside individuals Brian Fabian and Josh Raskin as defendants in Facebook's amended complaint. The suit also names Ming Wu and six as yet unnamed defendants.
Facebook filed the amended complaint last Wednesday after obtaining court orders forcing ISPs Rogers Communications and Look Communications to divulge subscriber information, the Toronto Star reports.
It's not terribly clear what data was accessed, much less the goals of the alleged attack. Court papers (PDF) allege the defendants uploaded scripted commands to a server run by a firm called Accretive to "gain unauthorised access and launch malicious code" on Facebook's site.
Facebook encourages users to post personal information such as birth date, hometown, email address, work details and even phone numbers online. This information is shared with a user's "friends" and, in a lot of cases, other on any network a user cares to join. The social networking utility boasts a membership of 34m users.
Any amount Facebook might hope to gain from this suit is surely outweighed by the damage to its already poor reputation for privacy. More than anything else the lawsuit emphasises that Facebook is an insecure place to post personal information. Since Facebook's business model, such as it is, relies on people coughing up this information, that's hardly a good thing.
SlickCash's alleged actions are also a bit of a puzzle. Experience suggests Facebook users are more than happy to allow access to all sorts of confidential info in return for nothing much more than a game. utility or pair of virtual magic beans. If someone wants user information then writing applications rather than straightforward brute-force hacking might be a more productive approach, you might think. ®
COMMENTS
Names
"The suit also names Ming Wu and six as yet unnamed defendants."
Dunt name em then duzzit?
Where are the editors?
"More than anything else the lawsuit emphasises that Facebook is an insecure place to post personal information."
How exactly? As far as I can see there was an *attempt* to access data. Might as well report that I tried to hack into a mate's account. I used the cunning tactic of trying a few random passwords but none of them are right. I did try, however, so look how insecure Facebook is! Shock! Horror!
zooiiiingggg!!!!!!!!
me thinks th'reg is trying to say that the public will view the attempt as the act, believing that the attack must have been successful,else why prosecute?
publicity , good or bad , affects public image. jonny mnemonic q public will hear: "###### #### prosecute ###### hacked facebook ##### personal data ################################[ illegal actions by porn co.]########### [names] ############# second time#########"
and think " omigod! like, i'm totally screwed because facebook is so , like, insecure!"
result: more bad press..............bitch.

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider