Feeds

HP plots path to server accelerator madness in '08

Radical conservatism

Security for virtualized datacentres

The likes of Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! And Amazon don't meet the classic HPC model, but they certainly seem closer to national labs than corporate types with their $500m-$600m data centers packed with thousands of servers and storage systems.

With that in mind, HP is engaging in internal discussions about how to handle mega data center types.

The company has discussed creating specialized low-power servers with under-achieving memory and cheap disks in a bid to cater to the mega data center set. Dell does something similar today for large orders through a custom data center program. In addition, Rackable Systems has met the needs of folks such as Microsoft and Amazon through its low-power systems.

As it turns out, a lot of Rackable's historical business has come through a reselling-type partnership with HP. Now, HP may go ahead and lead these efforts on its own.

"I don't want to pre-announce anything," Turkel said. "We are certainly looking at those markets and how we might be able to satisfy them."

While HP won't preannounce much of anything, it will talk about existing HPC wins.

We know. You're shocked.

The US, Western Europe and Japan have treated HP well to date in the supercomputer arena and now HP wants to tap into the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) nations with its fanciest gear.

HP has expressed its BRIC enthusiasm by pointing us – and consequently you – to a new list of China's top supercomputers. As it turns out, HP dominates the list, although IBM, as usual, has the top box.

HP's overall HPC play marks a continued trend to "balance" R&D work with partnerships.

You'll see IBM and Sun Microsystems at one of the spectrum building things such as their own chips, switches and file systems. And then Dell slots in at the other end of the spectrum by partnering in most cases and taking a wait and see approach to which bits and bobs take off.

HP proves more willing than Dell to stomach risk in the HPC game and is aggressive about partnering with start-ups, since this is the only way a company unwilling to invest as much R&D money as in the past can stay on the cutting-edge.

It's a sort of radical conservatism that appears to be serving HP will to date. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.