Nuff said but quick way to floor a company... Poor old ExpressionEngine (CMS on Apple Matters) even had to release their own statement. A bit bollocks if you develop a system and then some deluded t~@t comes up with a stunt like this. He deserves humilation and a public flogging.
By Steve TsuidaPosted Tuesday 27th November 2007 23:30 GMT
The hacking spree was nothing more than a very botched PR stunt by the sites allegedly hacked. A few hours ago now the story blew open and one of the "temple" (please) websites' editors confessed before things got out of hand.
On the weekend I installed rEFIt and Linux on my Powerbook Pro. It works fine, better than MacOS 10.
Who at Apple cooked up the behaviour for Mac OS 10 list boxes and selection using Shift & the arrow keys in Mac Mail? Try it sometime - it'll be one of the weirdest things you've seen in a long time.
If you want you want to strike a blow against the Mac OS 10 fanboies, Fedora 8 works well with rEFIt on a Macbook Pro. Just remember to use parted, not fdisk!
Also, now I have a file manager again that can <sarcasm> show a tree view of folders</sarcasm> and an associated <heavy sarcasm>list of files for each folder</heavy sarcasm>. Imagine: copying/moving files anywhere in a file system, all in a single window! <brutal sarcasm> Why didn't Apple invent that?</brutal sarcasm>
By Dana WPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 07:27 GMT
So, when did downloading, running and giving your password to a program you got off a porn site become a sophisticated trojan? Sounds more like an intelligence test.
Only Mac/PC difference is, go to a porn site with a PC and the site will install for you no passwords required! Proof of Microsoft Efficiency!
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 10:04 GMT
"The site was not hacked," a person who works for Apple Matters told us. "I was contacted by someone [and asked] to pretend it was a hack and it was a mistake."
Either Apple Matters are just stupid, or ignorant, or both.
By SpleenPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 10:18 GMT
Yes.
We need to be completely fair here and put this in perspective: personally, this hasn't changed my opinion of Mac users at all. I already knew they were tossers.
By Adrian WaterworthPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 10:24 GMT
"A - gives - toss - who!"
Re-arrange the words to form a well-known English phrase.
Don't get me wrong - I like Apple Macs a lot, we use them for various graphic design thingies around here and I'd love to get a huge iMac or kickass Mac Pro to use for music production at home. However, I'm mainly stuck with PCs for most of my work at the moment. I also happen to think that the iPhone is an over-hyped piece of plastic crap that, in all likelihood, is so full of interesting techno-trickery that it's probably a bit shit in the "actually being a decent phone" department. And I've never owned an iPod.
So, basically, the meanderings and pointless witterings of the Mac-loving bits of the blogosphere are like Siberia to me. I know it's there and where to find it, but don't have any particular interest in going there. (Actually, if we're being honest, I'm probably more interested in visiting Siberia than I am in reading Mac fanboi crap...)
By Big_BoomerPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 10:27 GMT
if your OS (or OS maker) is named after a fruit, a glass filled hole in a wall, or a Scandinavian developer. They are just tools. They are not an identifying badge of membership to an exclusive clique, they don't make you a better or more attractive person, they are just an OS.
Jeez, next thing ya know people will start arguing over which text editor is the best. Are you a NotePaddy, an UltraEditor or a VIrgin?
Sounds to me like an awful lot of people out there need to switch off their computers, leave their house/office, and get a frigging life.
By JamesPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 11:02 GMT
Is that my personal preference for $OS makes it objectively the best OS in the world. Anyone who likes any other OS is therefore utterly wrong and their personal preference is entirely the product of a diseased mind, and I can prove it by mentioning $minor_niggle. Take THAT, fanboys!
By Aaron HarrisPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 12:16 GMT
Would a builder, slag of a spade because he was using a trowel? Computers are a tool, M$ is good for certain tasks, UBUNTU for others, even MAC has its place.
How about keeping an open mind and using the tool that's appropriate for the job, instead of acting like a tool.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 12:59 GMT
At home we have a Mac, Lin boxes and Win boxes. Each one has it's own good points, some are better at some things than others. Overall, I prefer Linux, but some things it does, it really should be put of it's misery for. Like the previous poster pointed out, they really are just tools to get things done, not lifestyle choices or "gang colours".
I actually decided this the other day. When walking home through London I spotted a couple carrying their new Apple laptop home. The sad thing was, they looked just like the typical people you see in Apple promotional material, from the suede shoes to their docker trousers and black polo-neck's. Apple PR dept would have wet themselves with pride, had they seen them, then again they probably were from Apple PR dept!
In future, please pass the Apple store and go straight to the iLife store and purchase one.
By mahoneyPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 13:13 GMT
...Macs & Mac people. Maybe even more-so than I did yesterday.
Maybe he should check his own site for 'sploits' #
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 13:42 GMT
MySQL ERROR:
Error Number: 1064
Description: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ''a-bad-pr-stunt/'' ORDER BY trackback_date desc' at line 4
Query: SELECT exp_trackbacks.*, exp_weblog_titles.weblog_id, exp_weblog_titles.allow_trackbacks FROM exp_trackbacks LEFT JOIN exp_weblog_titles ON (exp_weblog_titles.entry_id = exp_trackbacks.entry_id) WHERE exp_weblog_titles.url_title = 'a-bad-pr-stunt/'' ORDER BY trackback_date desc
By LawPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 13:58 GMT
"Jeez, next thing ya know people will start arguing over which text editor is the best. Are you a NotePaddy, an UltraEditor or a VIrgin?"
Notepad++.... it's cool! :) Anybody who says otherwise should burn in hell, fanboys! :p
Nah... seriously tho... macs suck... I almost fell foul of their marketing a few days ago, when I had the choice between a £250 mediapc, or a £400 macmini..... then I had a quick go on OSX in an Apple store.... so now I'm the proud owner of a mediapc running XP and Ubuntu. :)
By Rodrigo RollanPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 14:06 GMT
Bog_Boomer I kind of tune in to your comment. I know lot´s of people have strong opinions on many things, Computer / OS brands are not the exeption. That being said...Come on people for crying out loud ! If you buy something (in the case of Widows, I am realistic, most people don´t even bother to buy it) and it does the job for you, well KUDOS, That´s all folks. You can have an opinion, you can even help someone out so they can make up their mind on waht to buy. But going to the extreme of arguing like 12 year olds on who´s got the biggest D*** is absolutely pointless. I find it more constructive to criticise your preffered brand....it keeps them on their toes, makes them work to improve theiir products even more. And yes, this is just my opinion...take it or leave it !
By Peter GathercolePosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 15:39 GMT
Thinking back, there was once a (pre PC) company called Peach (I think their home computers ran Forth rather than BASIC), and of course, many people consider an acorn as a fruit (why not start the Archimedes threads again, many fanbois there), and if you consider flowers as well, there was Tulip (surprisingly, a Dutch computer company).
And extending it to peripherals, there was a very popular (although I hated them, I'm an IBM Model M fan myself) soft-touch PC keyboard manufacturer called Cherry.
But Apple must be a double-whammy, because is there not there a variety of said fruit named Macintosh?
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 19:11 GMT
Okay, babies, Enough already.
I own 2 Windows XP computers - one I built myself, and a laptop, and a Macbook. I will eventually get around to running Linux as a LiveCD on the Windows laptop (that's my experimental workhorse, but only because I'm still learning Leopard). A good tool to have, because Linux can read NTFS files if your hard drive happens to crash and you haven't backed up your data lately...
I can only say that I find all this BS about "My OS is better than your OS" such total **** it reminds me of recess in gradeschool. "My daddy can beat up your daddy!" Who the hell gives a s**t?? The right tool for the right job, that's all an OS is. If it's reliable, and it does the job for you, wonderful. If it doesn't, then switch, for God's Sake! Or don't use it! But all of the bull I read in some of these posts makes me want to vomit sometimes. "I can't stand Mac users!" What makes you lump all of them into one category? I sure as hell don't lump all Linux/Unix/BSD/Vista lovers into their respective categories; I get the fact they have a preference. Maybe Fanbois (okay, agree on HATING that spelling!) take it too far - but fans of anything can take it too far. Go to any convention for a Science Fiction/Fantasy or some romance or paranormal lovers shindig, and you'll REALLY see some fans taking it to the limit. Makes Mac fans seem tame in comparison.
My point is, people who make statements like this, ARE JUST AS BAD AS THE APPLE/MAC FANBOIS. Stop stereotyping! You don't know all Mac users - You don't know all Linux users - or Vista users - etc. etc. etc. So before you start tossing out comments like this, take a good, long look in the mirror. Maybe the person looking back will have a thing or two to say that will enlighten you. Or not, if you're as deaf, dumb and blind as you appear to be.
By PhilipPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 19:35 GMT
The whole 'fanboy/i' range should be removed from authorised Reg Vocab forthwith. Anyone using either should also be banished. Especially when used in conjunction with 'all-caps MAC' to describe Apple machines.
They are clearly getting the Macintosh confused with 'MAC Address' and therefore shouldn't be reading this publication until they're able to demonstrate having completed a full course of 'Computer Active'.
And could we also table the tiresome 'WTF?' for 'lexicological cleansing' while we're at it?
By Chief subPosted Wednesday 28th November 2007 21:58 GMT
Can you sad old platform warriors step outside the old schoolyard for a moment and please not write MAC; it's a Mac.
It's not an abbreviation, like BBC, TUC or UN, where each letter stands for something and you enunciate each letter separately. Nor is it an acronym, such as Nato or Unicef, where each letter stands for something but the total is pronounced as one word. It's merely a shortening of "Macintosh", the desktop computers produced by Apple. The iPod, iPhone etc are not Macs - they use Apple's OSX, but they are not Macs.
And it was Basic, not BASIC.
I won't start on Anonymous Coward's appallingly cavalier attitude to apostrophes.
By ChadPosted Thursday 29th November 2007 05:49 GMT
By E
Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 19:17 GMT
It is a 14 month old 15" Powerbook Pro. 2GHz dual core pentium, ATI X1660 graphics.
***********
wow, you really don't know much about your computer do ya? No such thing as a Powerbook Pro, everything with the Powerbook name was PPC, no intels.. and the only Mac ever made with a Pentium chip in it was a developer model never sold to the general public.... also isnt an ATI X1660 around anywhere.
I'm guessing you have a 15" Macbook Pro with a Core Duo (maybe a Core 2 Duo) 2ghz processor with a ATI X1600.
By Martin BensonPosted Friday 30th November 2007 13:40 GMT
..but when I first used BASIC back in 1970 on a PDP-10 on a timesharing 30bps modem on a Teletype, it was BASIC - but only because there were no lower-case letters. Hell, we only had five-bit paper tape, and had to use figure-shift and letter shift....
But BASIC is just the name, because it was basic, and someone thought it was a good name. Anyone who tells you it's an acronym is talking out of their hat. Beginner's All-Purpose Symbolic Instruction Code was retro-fitted later, probably in the late seventies.
Oh - and vi, without a doubt. Actually, vim is even better.
Comments on: Hacker defaces temples to OS X
Are the Apple fanboys... #
By Greg Posted Tuesday 27th November 2007 21:56 GMT
Feel sorry for the CMS provider!! #
By Emj Posted Tuesday 27th November 2007 22:15 GMT
haxed or not haxed, that is the question. #
By LaeMi Qian Posted Tuesday 27th November 2007 22:40 GMT
It's a confirmed fraud. #
By Steve Tsuida Posted Tuesday 27th November 2007 23:30 GMT
Heheheh #
By E Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 00:55 GMT
@Feel sorry for the CMS provider!! #
By E Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 00:56 GMT
I think it was #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 02:45 GMT
What is this Apple you speak of? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 03:45 GMT
Trojan? #
By Dana W Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 07:27 GMT
re: What is this Apple you speak of? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 08:36 GMT
Glenn Wolsey update #
By Graham Human Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 08:37 GMT
Growing Pains #
By Matthew Glubb Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 09:08 GMT
oh cripes #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 09:58 GMT
@E #
By Scott Mckenzie Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 10:03 GMT
Social Engineering... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 10:04 GMT
@Greg #
By Spleen Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 10:18 GMT
Hmmmm... #
By Adrian Waterworth Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 10:24 GMT
Ahhh, who cares.... #
By Big_Boomer Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 10:27 GMT
The important thing to remember here #
By James Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 11:02 GMT
Oh come on #
By Lloyd Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 11:39 GMT
Tools for the job #
By Aaron Harris Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 12:16 GMT
He deserves humilation and a public flogging.' #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 12:23 GMT
Perhaps...... #
By Andy Worth Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 12:28 GMT
Oh please, just grow up! #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 12:59 GMT
I still hate... #
By mahoney Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 13:13 GMT
Maybe he should check his own site for 'sploits' #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 13:42 GMT
RE: Ahhh, who cares.... #
By Law Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 13:58 GMT
iBored #
By Hedley Phillips Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 14:01 GMT
G.A.L. Clinique #
By Rodrigo Rollan Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 14:06 GMT
I still hate... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 14:37 GMT
'stunt'? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 15:34 GMT
Fruity #
By Peter Gathercole Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 15:39 GMT
FANBOI!??? #
By Gavin McMenemy Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 15:47 GMT
HERE HERE #
By mahoney Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 16:55 GMT
Let the pissing contest begin. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 19:11 GMT
@Scott Mckenzie #
By E Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 19:17 GMT
MAC user fanBOIS - WTF? #
By Philip Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 19:35 GMT
Tools! #
By AndyB Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 21:33 GMT
@big_boomer #
By mhewitson Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 21:57 GMT
It's not the BBC, y'know #
By Chief sub Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 21:58 GMT
RE: Ahhh, who cares.... #
By dennis Fischer Posted Wednesday 28th November 2007 22:38 GMT
RE: Basic/BASIC #
By A Non Posted Thursday 29th November 2007 02:37 GMT
what? #
By Chad Posted Thursday 29th November 2007 05:49 GMT
No it is BASIC #
By Thaddeus Aid Posted Thursday 29th November 2007 14:09 GMT
weak. #
By DeFex Posted Thursday 29th November 2007 15:15 GMT
@chad #
By E Posted Thursday 29th November 2007 18:53 GMT
Time to unplug for a little people... #
By Ernest Cunningham Posted Friday 30th November 2007 11:38 GMT
Not that it's relevant.... #
By Martin Benson Posted Friday 30th November 2007 13:40 GMT