Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/20/hushmail_update/
Hushmail has updated its terms of service to clarify that encrypted emails sent through the service can still be turned over to law enforcement officials, providing they obtain a court order in Canada.
September court documents (pdf (http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/steroids.source.prod_affiliate.25.pdf)) from a US federal prosecution of alleged steroid dealers reveals that Hush Communications turned over 12 CDs involving emails on three targeted Hushmail accounts, in compliance of court orders made through the mutual assistance treaty between the US and Canada. Hushmail is widely used by privacy advocates and the security-conscious to send confidential emails.
Hush Communications, the firm behind Hushmail, previously claimed "not even a Hushmail employee with access to our servers can read your encrypted email".
However an updated explanation (http://www.hushmail.com/about-security?PHPSESSID=92beb14b59dcb705af04d63f7980d2de) states that it is obliged to do everything in its power to comply with court orders against specified, targeted accounts. Unlocking targeted accounts involves sending a rogue Java applet to targeted users that captures a user's passphrase and sends it back to Hush Communications. This information, when passed onto law enforcement officials, allows access to stored emails and subsequent correspondence sent through the service.
The possibility that law enforcement officials can tap targeted accounts exists whether or not Hushmail users use the supposedly more secure Java applet option or a simpler web server encryption set-up. The updated terms of service explain:
Hushmail is a web-based service, the software that performs the encryption either resides on or is delivered by our servers. That means that there is no guarantee that we will not be compelled, under a court order issued by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada, to treat a user named in a court order differently, and compromise that user's privacy.
International criminals and terrorists ought to look elsewhere for their encrypted email needs, Hush Communications explains.
"If you expect to engage in activity that might result in a court order issued by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada, Hushmail is not the right choice for you," it said, adding that stand-alone desktop encryption packages such as PGP Desktop provide higher levels of security than web-based services.
PGP creator Phil Zimmermann has long fought to keep the software free of backdoors. Even after the September 11 attacks his convictions (http://www.philzimmermann.com/EN/faq/index.html) about privacy and civil liberties were strong enough to withstand pressure to tamper with the software, despite evidence it was been used by terrorists as well as its intended audience of human rights activists.
However, Zimmermann has defended Hushmail compliance with court orders, arguing that users who pick web-based products for their ease of use can't expect absolute security. Zimmermann, who sits on Hushmail's advisory board and helped found the service, told Wired: "Just because encryption is involved, that doesn't give you a talisman against a prosecutor. They can compel a service provider to cooperate."
Zimmermann explained that Hushmail has little option but to comply with Canadian court orders, adding that the service remained far more secure than other webmail services. ®
Showdown over encryption password in child porn case (16 January 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/16/encryption_password_showdown/
Hushmail open to Feds with court orders (8 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/08/hushmail_court_orders/
Crypto browser plug-in aims for simplicity (26 August 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/26/freenigma/
PGP creator offers VoIP crypto to Windows users (23 May 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/23/zfone/
PGP use ruled relevant in child abuse case (25 May 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/25/pgp_admissable_child_abuse_case/
PGP goes the whole hog of encryption (9 May 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/09/pgp_desktop_revamp/
Hushmail hit by DNS attack (25 April 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/25/hushmail_dns_attack/
PGP dies of neglect – your alternatives (12 March 2002)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/03/12/pgp_dies_of_neglect_your/
How we can save PGP – Zimmermann (8 March 2002)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/03/08/how_we_can_save_pgp/
Hush – do you want to store a secret? (9 January 2002)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/01/09/hush_do_you_want/
Zimmermann defends strong crypto against govt assault (3 October 2001)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/10/03/zimmermann_defends_strong_crypto_against/
Cyber Rights Hush up new RIP powers (1 November 2000)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/11/01/cyber_rights_hush_up_new/
© Copyright 2008