Security:
News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘Thumb twiddling Mozilla promises fix for privacy-biting bug’Your door is a jarPublished Monday 19th November 2007 20:28 GMT
Mac or Windows or both?By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 19th November 2007 21:28 GMT
Does the security flaw live in Mac, Windows or both? ps: looks like it applies to Mac?By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 19th November 2007 21:34 GMT
One may wish to Tools > Add-ons > NoScript > Preferences > edit preferences as it seems quite filled already? @Mac or Windows or both?By Dan Goodin
Posted Monday 19th November 2007 23:27 GMT
Anonymous Coward, Good question. According to Mozilla, Linux, Mac and Windows versions of Firefox are vulnerable. We've updated our story to reflect this. So much for the IE bashersBy Steve Renouf
Posted Tuesday 20th November 2007 08:53 GMT
Oh, so Firefox isn't immune to flaws afterall........!! Rapid responseBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 20th November 2007 09:39 GMT
So much for the much-vaunted security advantages that Firefox is supposed to possess over IE! Eight months makes M$'s monthly update schedule seem prompt. Don't get me wrong, I use Firefox in preference to IE, but I'm sick of hearing the fanbois claim that Firefox is so much more secure. NoScript blocks thisBy Ash
Posted Tuesday 20th November 2007 10:29 GMT
It has done for the past two or three revisions. IE is worseBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 20th November 2007 13:34 GMT
@Anonymous Coward As I recall, IE is even worse with this kind of hard-to-fix security issue. (We're talking years here.) firefox still better than IEBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Friday 23rd November 2007 17:07 GMT
> I'm sick of hearing the fanbois claim that Firefox is so much more secure. Well, I am not fanboy (I don't use Firefox) but, just because Firefox has bugs, it doesn't make it less secure than IE. Firefox is much more secure than IE, even with this bug. The period for commenting on this story has finished |
|
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search