Skip to content

Biting the hand that feeds IT

The Register ®

Science:


Related Whitepapers

[Print][Mobile][Alerts]

US doesn't need orbital battlefleet - pundit

1900s style space-dreadnought arms race would be Bad

Page: < Prev 1 2
Published Tuesday 6th November 2007 13:44 GMT

In almost every instance, Arming the Heavens comes down against space-based kit to do each of the given jobs, suggesting either that the task isn't necessary, isn't doable or that terrestrial gear could do it more cheaply. The only space kit which gets a qualified thumbs-up is cheap decoy satellites among which useful American comms, nav and spy birds could hide from enemy sat-kill strikes. The full text of the report is available here (128-page pdf) for those interested.

It looks as though jobs in the future US Space Navy* may remain hard to come by for a while, based on Kosiak's analysis. Very right and proper, no doubt, but still mildly depressing for the science fiction buffs among us. ®

*Past and present-day astronauts/cosmonauts usually have to spend a long time aboard cramped orbital structures such as Mir and the ISS in order to make their launch costs worthwhile. Assuming that any large human presence was required by the US space forces of the future, their lifestyle would probably be far more like being in the navy than being in the air force. On the other hand, if the people spent their time mainly at ground stations, a better name might be US Space Force/Aerospace Force etc.

Page: < Prev 1 2
Track this type of story as a custom Atom/RSS feed or by email.
Previous Article Next Article
whitepaper title

Solution Brief: Reduce Energy Costs

Energy consumption has become a big issue. Dramatically increase server utilization and significantly reduce energy costs through Virtualization..
whitepaper title

Making Green IT a Reality

Customer Perspectives on the Impact of Storage Vendor Decisions on Power, Cooling, & Space in Enterprise Data Centers.
Whitepapers Jobs

Top 20 storiesAll The Week’s HeadlinesArchiveSearch