The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Government acts on Land Registry fears

Downloads reduced on fraudster fears

What you need to know about cloud backup

The government is stopping downloads of some documents from the Land Registry website following newspaper reports that the site was being exploited by fraudsters.

The Mail on Sunday reported criminal gangs have stolen £12m by downloading documents from the site and using them to commit mortgage frauds.

From midnight tonight you will not be able to download scanned documents - the fear seems to be that criminals were downloading documents in order to get access to scanned signatures on documents.

The website offers information on 20 million registered properties in England and Wales. For a £3 payment you could download copies of title register, title plan or £10 or £20 for copies of leases.

From tomorrow anyone wanting such documents will have to apply in writing or visit a Land Registry office.

A spokeswoman for the Land Registry told the Reg: "You will still be able to see title register and plans but not documents referred to on the register like leases. You can still see these documents but you will need to apply in writing or in person at an office."

There's more from the Mail here, but do watch out for the startling and mildly disturbing picture of Tory MP Peter Lilley.

The Land Registry statement is here. ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Latest Comments

Policy violation?

Doesn't govt infosec policy require a risk assessment before systems are developed? Blind Freddy should have seen this one coming. Too much to hope that the moron concerned will be sacked for incompetance.

Land Titles are the Crown Jewels of developed economies. If the land title system ceases to be trustworthy then the economy of the affected country has had it. Welcome to the third world.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Filling in the blanks

If its the signatures that are the problem, why not blank them out?

Shouldn't be too difficult to semi-automate, assuming the signatures appear in a defined place (usually the end) rather than being scattered randomly throughout the documents.

Of course, the long term answer is not to scan any future documents but to require them to be created online in the first place. That would make it much easier to create a "safe to distribute" version for online download, omitting such parts as might be considered a security risk.

0
0

Cardboard cutout

Why didn't they just blank out the signature section

a) when scanning the original

or b) when fetching the image for display

0
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
NSA whistleblower to tech firms, Obama: 'Grow a pair!'
Ed Snowden: Email tracking grabs 'IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything'
 breaking news
Ecuador: All right, Julian, you CAN stay on our sofa - it's your human right
Minister and Wikileaker share cosy chat in tiny London flat
Google flings another £1m at online child sex abuse vid CRACKDOWN
See, see, we're trying, ad giant tells Daily Mail UK.gov
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
 breaking news
BBC lied to Parliament about doomed £100m IT monster, thunder MPs
Axed DMI ballooned and burst while watchdogs sang Kumbaya
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights