Feeds

BBC tech chief: You Freetards don't matter

And no one gives a toss about DRM. So there

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

As the BBC's New Media technology chief, Ashley Highfield has some tough questions to answer. What is the 4,000 strong division really doing? How did the BBC manage to burn through £100m - what a Silicon Valley start-up can spend in ten years [*] - to develop a single piece of client software?

As he went on a PR offensive last week, El Reg was excluded - because we ask the wrong sort of questions. But his intent was clear.

Besieged by Linux users and anti-DRM campaigners, the BBC's tech chief has embarked on a campaign to call their bluff.

In an interview with BBC Backstage, Highfield argued that the BBC never intended to exclude Linux users from iPlayer feature parity with Windows, and would get there in the end.

The DRM and Linux crowd are being lined up as the whipping boys - a welcome distraction from what a thorough examination of the BBC New Media's department might unearth. Unfortunately, these rights-for-gadgets campaigners are only too happy to play the part of the boob. On Highfield's blog, one Penguinista has already gifted us what must be one of the quotes of the year, with this contribution:

"I would like to say," he writes, "that accessiblity [sic] for Linux users is EXACTLY the same issue as accessibility for those with disabilities."

Yes, both pay the compulsory tax that funds the BBC. But being a paraplegic is not a choice, in the way that choosing a hobbyist operating system is a choice, and the tasteless comparison doesn't reflect well on the "digital rights" campaigners.

And, heck - why stop there? Why not require that the BBC to retransmit its programmes in the Klingon language? Google already offers a Klingon language version of its search engine. It surely costs very little to add subtitles, and we can take it from there.

What a gift for the besieged Highfield.

A smart man, one wonders whether he's channelling Fake Steve Jobs accidentally, or deliberately.

A blast of righteous indignation from the Daily Mail about sandal-wearing hippies bleeding the taxpayer dry can't be too far away. One wonders what has kept them so long.

Policing the Linux protestor

So that's the first piece of evidence that suggests Highfield is calling the campaigners' bluff. In doing so, he's laid a huge hole for them to march into, all placards waving.

The second is DRM.

The DRM bluff

The small but noisy anti-copyright lobby wants to be able to swap BBC content freely, wherever they are in the world. In challenging this notion, Highfield is throwing creators' rights and taxpayers' rights into the equation.

The BBC is under no obligation to provide stuff for free for the world, and the potential opportunity cost of giving away material, rather than licensing it to other broadcasters who would cheerfully pay for it, will cost the corporation far more than the iPlayer fiasco. The cost of acquiring the rights outright and upfront from producers, which the campaigners demand, would be extremely expensive - and the beneficiaries would be non-taxpayers.

Why should the BBC, Highfield is asking, spend so much more merely for the benefit of students in Ithica and Kalamazoo can swap files? And do taxpayers need to exchange files, or merelyview the material on demand?

Once again, it isn't hard to imagine another Daily Mail splash on the BBC pouring money down the drain - for the benefit of foreign freeloaders. It's a well-rehearsed script: just rub out the word "benefit fraud" and insert "digital fraud".

Highfield also has an ace up his sleeve.

While the public rejects DRM on music within a few seconds of realising the implications, it isn't clear that there's such opposition to other kinds of content, alas.

As a rule of thumb, people reject technology when it makes something harder - and DRM on music stops people doing what they've done with songs since the invention of the consumer tape recorder. But few people object when it's attached to something they didn't have before. On balance, the DRM is weighed against the perceived "advantage" - and from there, we're into specifics.

iPlayer content viewable on a PC certainly falls into the category of "something we didn't have before" - although the advantage is slight. Many Britons can already view on-demand services through a set-top box, and it isn't clear why we need to view it on a PC at all. Especially since the infrastructure doesn't really support it: British ISPs are under no obligation to go broke to fulfill this requirement.

In conclusion, then, Highfield is calling the campaigners bluff on two areas dear to their hearts: support for hobbyist platforms, and DRM.

Yet those tough questions at the top of this article haven't been answered, with campaigners providing easy fodder for Highfield.

I trust that Highfield has a swear box by his bedside, into which he makes generation donations to the these campaigners -they've gifted him the opportunity to avoid being accountable on the issues that really matter.

Hurrah, for "digital rights"! ®

*Bootnote: Before me are accounts scavenged from the offices of Be Inc. more than five years ago. Over nine years, Be developed a cross-platform operating system (and a computer) - for around £405.

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.