By TrogPosted Wednesday 31st October 2007 21:36 GMT
This only goes to show that wetware technologies will always be ahead of those namby pamby silicon-based wannabees. Galaxy Zoo has been using the same principle for a while, computers can only do so much, and pattern recognition isn't one of the things they are good at. The only solution is to farm the job out to something that *is* good at it, i.e. humans. Eat my synapses Skynet, you couldn't find a nun in a poppy field!
I'm amazed this even had to be a Trojan. A legitimate games website could make a fortune from this. "Type some letters and see some skin!!". What could be simpler for a game format? Could have made a fortune from click-though alone.
By Steve TaylorPosted Wednesday 31st October 2007 23:36 GMT
The idea isn't new, but BoingBoing articles aside, this is the first time I've heard of an actual implementation. I remember when the idea first turned up as a hypothetical, and how the story quickly mutated from "someone could..." to "someone did..."
By Steven KnoxPosted Wednesday 31st October 2007 23:47 GMT
Actually, computers are too good at pattern recognition. That's why the captchas work. What the computers are not so good at is the fuzzy logic which allows humans to delude themselves into thinking that, for example, "GOOD" is the same pattern as "G00D" or that ; ) is a winking-smiley face.
Make sure that the graphic has a Yahoo! logo somewhere in it (background, or in a corner). Then the id10t stripper program user will see that something is a bit amiss. Pretty simple if you ask me. All captchas should have something identifying where they came from. The surrounding text should have further instructions like enter only the letters (and the graphic has digits and letters).
By Stuart Van OnselenPosted Thursday 1st November 2007 07:30 GMT
My guess is that it is all real-time. In fact, it probably has to be, as captchas often expire quickly.
So, as soon as you enter the digits, the trojan forwards it to Yahoo/GMail/Hotmail, where it has already started trying to create an account. If it gets the "thank you for registering" screen from them, it knows you got it right. If it gets the "piss off, robot!" screen, it tells you to try again.
@Jason: Most firewalls do this automatically anyway, so I would think Yahoo has implemented this already, however it doesn't work with BotNet clients because of the distributed nature of a botnet, and it won't work in this case for exactly the same reason.. In this case, the users are the "bot".
@Tom: I think probably that someone trying to get a stripper undressed might be a little distracted and not really be bothered, if they notice at all. However your idea of involving the entire web page in a captcha technology might be a good basis to start from.. For example, you could dot Catcha letters at random places around the screen, or in a circle of several smaller Captcha screens, with instructions to read clockwise or anticlockwise or something.. You're right, it needs work, but it's certainly sounds like a go.. It would be interesting if between the readers of this article we were able to design an uncrackable Captcha system.. El Reg.. We want some of the profits please, or leave it open source!! Actually, no, we want the profits, forget open source! :-)
By Joseph ZygnerskiPosted Thursday 1st November 2007 17:00 GMT
I've been told that it's nigh impossible for a computer to tell the difference between a kitten and a puppy. Maybe we should move away from typing in letters to picking if a pic is of a kitten or a puppy.
I look forward to the game wherein you have to identify kittens and puppies to get the stripper to take her clothes off...
Comments on: Virtual! stripper! game! targets! Yahoo!
How about #
By Jason Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 19:11 GMT
I'm a bit confoozed! #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 19:12 GMT
Hardly 'new'... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 20:37 GMT
ROTM my bottom! #
By Trog Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 21:36 GMT
Re: Hardly 'new'... #
By Steve Taylor Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 23:36 GMT
Pattern Recognition (@Trog) #
By Steven Knox Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 23:47 GMT
Simple for Yahoo! to annoy #
By Tom Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 01:08 GMT
@I'm a bit confoozed! #
By Stuart Van Onselen Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 07:30 GMT
Not so simple.... #
By Jon Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 10:13 GMT
Get rid of the letters, then #
By Joseph Zygnerski Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 17:00 GMT