Feeds

Brussels politicos: More cash for Galileo, pronto

'Indispensable strategic tool'

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Galileo, the rolling European satnav project fracas, has hit the headlines again as parliamentarians in Brussels demand extra funds for the coming year.

Thus far, Galileo consists of little more than an orbiting placeholder, thrown up hastily to hold onto critical spectrum. However, it is planned to become a world-girdling satnav system to rival - or exceed - the US military's GPS in reliability and quality.

Originally, Galileo was to be a public-private partnership, but the private sector saw few chances for revenue in a world where the GPS civil signal is free and refuses to stump up much cash. Participating nations agreed in principle that public funds would make up the shortfall, but remain split on how this is to be achieved.

Britain, Germany, and the Netherlands would like to channel the rescue funds via the European Space Agency (ESA), which would result in a Galileo not under Brussels' control. In that case, the system would probably be entirely civil in nature, as the ESA has no aspirations to be a government.

Other EU nations led by France would prefer that the Galileo topup cash come via the European Commission (EC) in Brussels. The EC says this could be achieved using unspent farm subsidies, involving no extra money. However, the end result would be a Galileo which was a tool of EU strategic policy, just as GPS is for America.

Now, AFP reports that deputies in the EU parliament have endorsed this second roadmap during planned debates.

"Parliament cannot accept jeopardising Galileo... which is an indispensable strategic tool," said French socialist MEP Catherine Guy-Quint.

"Parliament is asking for this project to be run properly and that the funding shortfalls should be found from the community budget," added Finnish Liberal Kyosti Virrankoski.

The deputies scratched out the current planned figure of €151m for Galileo in the 2008 EU budget. This sum was set in July, at which point the agreement for public funds to replace private was only just firmed up at national-ministerial level.

Now the EU reps want the EC to rewrite its budget plans for the next few years and pull forward an extra €739m to get Galileo rolling in earnest. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
4chan outraged by Emma Watson nudie photo leak SCAM
In the immortal words of Shaggy, it wasn't me us ... amirite?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.