The Register®

Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Facebook bug dishes out notes designated private

Good work FaceBook 

Posted Tuesday 23rd October 2007 21:40 GMT

Thumb Down

Want to alienate customers and piss them off? Hide issues from them, Crisis Management 101.

Not just notes, but mail too 

Posted Tuesday 23rd October 2007 22:27 GMT

A while back, I had mail between two people I didn't know in both my Inbox and Sent Mail folders on Facebook. I submitted a support request about it but never heard back. Blogged about it at http://pw201.livejournal.com/79791.html

A Simple Solution for Simple People 

Posted Tuesday 23rd October 2007 23:07 GMT

Stop

If you're dumb enough to use Facebook or MySpace or whateva other Web 2.0 site you completely deserve having all your private details exposed to the world. The solution is simple, just stop being an attention whore.

Bugs... 

Posted Tuesday 23rd October 2007 23:29 GMT

A lot of these bugs that I hear of are just so stupid, it amazes me that the programmers let them slip. What's so hard about querying a database to see if a message is marked public or private, and displaying it if and only if it's public?

Agree with Eddie 

Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 00:42 GMT

Stop

...Sort off.

First, I do have a Facebook account. But I accept my own clumsy attempt at being more social, when I should really just pop round the relevant mate's house. What I don't do is put anything personal or sensitive on Facebook.

Like Eddie says (is that an alias or a real name, doh) there have been enough question marks about Facebook and exposing too many personal details. If you put all your details or private information on there, you are either a) an idiot or b) young or craxy enough to want to use your details to try for the shag factor.

Either way, good luck to you :-)

Why on earth? 

Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 07:55 GMT

Would anyone put any data that qualified as sensitive anywhere near Web 2.0 sites?

@Jach 

Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 09:00 GMT

I think the clue is in the word 'bug'.

"This is not a bug" 

Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 09:06 GMT

Joke

I think I've heard that one before. Allow me to translate:

"To clarify, this is not a bug. This user most likely set their Notes privacy settings to 'Only Me,' however, they include Notes on their Limited Profile. Therefore, the people on their Limited Profile list can see their notes."

... or to translate:

"This is not a bug, it's just stupid, misleading labelling of the privacy setting options"

Since when did "Only Me" mean "Only me, my family, my friends, and my friends friends who I met a party once... and that girl I met in a pub who seemed pretty hot, but turned out to be a complete wierdo, and will probably torch my house if I remove her from my friends list"

Facebook 

Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 12:35 GMT

... and? Storm, teacup?

Here's a hint, it's really basic, don't put anything on Facebook (irrespective of privacy settings) that you give a damn about. Nothing you want to retain copyright to, they own it, nothing you want to keep private (it's called a SOCIAL network) and nothing you'd be too ashamed for a prospective employer to see - they do look you know.

Facebook's alright - but just use a bit of common.

Don’t Miss

Warning: roadworksNetbooks and Mini-Laptops

Buyer's Guide They're little and we love 'em. But which ones are best?

Warning: roadworksIntel shakes AMD's chip-fabbing baby

Cross-licensing custody battle

Emails show journalist rigged Wikipedia's naked shorts

Overstock's Byrne vindicated amidst economic meltdown

Warning StopYours truly, angry mob

Book extract Bringing Nothing To The Party: Cleaning up the net, one satirical vigilante page at a time