The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Facebook bug dishes out notes designated private

Company reps keep the flaw secret

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Facebook users who type sensitive information into a site feature known as Notes may be interested in knowing that it is currently experiencing a bug that allows documents designated as private to be read anyway.

A Facebook customer service representative privately confirmed the bug to a user who complained that notes he configured to be private were anything but. That was on Friday. Four days later, the site has yet to issue any public notification of the flaw.

"We hope to resolve this note privacy settings bug that you described as soon as possible," a rep by the name of Pam wrote. "I would suggest that you contact us in several days if this problem has not been fixed."

This isn't the first time Facebook has failed to make good on promises to keep user information private. In June, a researcher disclosed a Facebook hole that publicly revealed a user's political views, religious back ground and other sensitive details even when a profile was configured so it was viewable only to designated friends.

Facebook added a blog-like feature called Notes in August 2006. Notes can be tagged with the names of other Facebook users so they automatically receive a copy. Facebook also provides a means that's supposed to keep them private.

"Does this mean you already knew about this problem but have continued to let people use notes without any warning?" the Facebook user wrote in response to Pam's email. "Is this solely related to notes or does this affect other parts of facebook/apps?"

Excellent questions. But unfortunately, Pam didn't answer. Several hours after this story was published, a Facebook spokeswoman emailed to say the problem was the result of the user setting up conflicting privacy settings.

"To clarify, this is not a bug," she wrote. "This user most likely set their Notes privacy settings to 'Only Me,' however, they include Notes on their Limited Profile. Therefore, the people on their Limited Profile list can see their notes." ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Latest Comments

Facebook

... and? Storm, teacup?

Here's a hint, it's really basic, don't put anything on Facebook (irrespective of privacy settings) that you give a damn about. Nothing you want to retain copyright to, they own it, nothing you want to keep private (it's called a SOCIAL network) and nothing you'd be too ashamed for a prospective employer to see - they do look you know.

Facebook's alright - but just use a bit of common.

0
0

Why on earth?

Would anyone put any data that qualified as sensitive anywhere near Web 2.0 sites?

0
0
Anonymous Coward

@Jach

I think the clue is in the word 'bug'.

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Number of cops abusing Police National Computer access on the rise
Only a telegram from the Queen can get you off it
 breaking news
NSA PRISM snoop-gate: Won't someone think of the children, wails Apple
10,000 things probed, mostly about missing kids, Alzheimer patients, we're told
Flash flaw potentially makes every webcam or laptop a PEEPHOLE
But it's a Google problem - Chrome only, insists Adobe
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
 breaking news
Yahoo! joins! rivals! in! PRISM! data! request! admission!
Keep calm and carry on using American tech firms, folks
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
Speech-to-text drives motorists to distraction
Will talking to you mean I crash into that car up ahead, Siri?
DHS warns of vulns in hospital medical equipment
Has your doctor's anasthesia machine been hacked?
 breaking news
'BadNews is malware' says outfit that found it
Google says code harmless but Lookout says code base is evolving