Public Sector:
News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘Identity and Passport Service announces ID supplier shortlist’Eight make the cutPublished Monday 22nd October 2007 09:38 GMT
The same Usual SuspectsBy Leroy Fevrius
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 09:51 GMT
Considering the records of some of these companies with government contracts you'd think they'd be off the short list. Ah well at least we know that with them in charge buggering the system up, our freedom is at least safe! There must be a mistake...By Michael Parker
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 10:13 GMT
...I don't see Fasthosts as one of the top 5? but it won't be...By Tawakalna
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 10:21 GMT
..iSoft. Whoever it is, it will be a disaster for which we'll be paying for years. Rolling on the floor, laughing my ass offBy David Harper
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 10:40 GMT
That's the best news about the national ID system that I've heard in a long time. Not only is the government shortlisting a bunch of companies which have spectacularly screwed up previous major IT projects, but it looks like the work will be split between several of them, which pretty much dooms the entire thing to utter and complete failure. The only down side is that the companies involved will end up with billions of pounds of OUR tax money before the project is written off as a disaster. The government never learnsBy Simon Greenwood
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 10:41 GMT
Personally, I don't mind, as a contractor it will give me plenty of work to do on a system that will probably never be rolled out properly *polishes golden wheelbarrow* Few, that's a reliefBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 10:58 GMT
I thought they were serious about delivering it. Now that the short list has been narrowed down to Koko, Lulubell, Pongo, Spanky and Gabo with a track record of floppy shoes, red noses, and miniature cars with eccentric wheels, it's clear this is just a little light entertainment to cheer us up! Will they shoot the home secretary out of a canon? Can you name one government project, that that lot have ever delivered to original budget and original schedule? Just one? Ahh, but we laugh at their antics, that's the important thing. 900 million for a prisoner tracking system, haha, 2.3 billion to merge 3 army databases, lol, what characters! The laughter is worth the billions in wasted IT budgets. 50 Show interest?By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 10:58 GMT
50 Show interest paired down to 10 to move forward. Could it be that only 8 applied usual spin. EDS - Why?By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 10:59 GMT
Who in the government is getting the back-hander's that allows EDS to continue to be considered as a capable provider of IT - EDS couldn't manage the CSA and now they're going to be allowed to expand to cover the UK. Can someone name that tosser? Unprofessional reviewBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 11:06 GMT
Accenture : Bid with a few good staff, replace with cheap graduates, swamp project. Project overrun but they are so good at the commercials it'll end up costing the taxpayer billions. BAE Systems : Project overrun. Should be good on security. Will they bribe their way onto the shortlist ? CSC : Company going down the pan, staff leaving in droves, low morale. Just what's needed... EDS : How, for F**ks sake, did they make the shortlist with their track record? Project overrun but they are so good at the commercials it'll end up costing the taxpayer billions Fujitsu : Quality. However, not good at influencing government, won't make the shortlist. IBM : SOA everyhere. Technology purity will kill the project. Project overrun but they are so good at the commercials it'll end up costing the taxpayer billions Steria : Won't get past the shortlist, how did they make it through so far ? Thales : They provide much of the IT/Comms for Network Rail. 'nough said ? EDS - I'm shocked?By Mike Richards
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 13:33 GMT
If EDS. why not Groucho, Harpo, Zippo, Chico and Gummo? Mike. Re:EDS - Why?By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 15:05 GMT
I was of the opinion that giving the contract to EDS would a good thing because it would mean that ID cards would never see the light of day Then I realised that they will make like they did with the CSA and Tax Credits software. Roll it out even though its complete shite and unfit for purpose. You may well find plod beating in your door down in the middle of the night because EDS' shitty software cross-referenced your DNA with a terrorist crime scene. Nex thing you know, MI5 will have renditioned you to some 3rd world shithole so they can apply electrodes to your gonads until you confess. @ AndyBBy MikeWW
Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 15:50 GMT
I bet HMRC are saying "Please, Please, PLEASE Let it be EDS" as well. Isn't their compensation from the last SNAFU by EDS based on what contracts EDS are awarded in the future? The period for commenting on this story has finished
|
|
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search