The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Symantec pushes Backup Exec with Altiris

One console shall manage them all

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

SNW Symantec plans to integrate its latest Windows recovery software into the Altiris management platform next month. The move was made today in step with Storage Networking World in Dallas.

The two products will marry using Backup Exec System Recovery Integration Component for Altiris — which conveniently is both the name and a punctilious description of the addition (we'll use BESRICfA for short, although Symantec doesn't officially approve of the acronym. Serves them right though).

BESRICfA lets customers use key features from Symantec Backup Exec System Recovery 7.0, such as reporting, status, backup job, and overall system protection information within the Altiris console and assign policies to their systems. That is, assuming they have both products.

The integration also provides Altiris customers with the ability to convert physical systems to virtual and virtual to physical as well as granular recovery for Microsoft Exchange. End-user file recovery capabilities can be utilized via Google Desktop or Backup Exec Retrieve.

Symantec senior product manager L D Weller said customers should expect more products to be manageable from Altiris in the future, as customers are taking a shine to having fewer user interfaces to negotiate.

The integration should hit the floor around 5 November, according to Weller. Customers using Altiris will be able to purchase Backup Exec at upgrade price.

But do you need a backup plan?

Ah, do they have a study for you

Symantec announced the finding of an international study that shows woeful business trends regarding disaster planning and preparedness.

I wonder if they have an angle? Ah well, let's dive into the numbers:

While 91 per cent of polled organizations carry out full scenario testing for their disaster recovery plans, nearly 50 per cent failed those tests.

What IT professionals consider a threat to their systems is worthy of note. Sixty-nine per cent cited natural disasters, 57 per cent named virus attacks, and 31 per cent specified war and/or terrorism. IT-specific threats keep the most managers nervous, with 67 per cent citing computer failure and 57 per cent naming external computer threats.

Almost 90 per cent of respondents have sat down with the team and agreed upon acceptable levels of risk with non-IT business executives in their organization. Only 33 per cent have gone to measures to protect themselves from the threats to which they feel exposed.

Symantec said its 2007 report was conducted by independent market research firm Dynamic Markets during June and July 2007. The study polled IT managers in large organizations spanning the US, 11 European countries, the Middle East, and South Africa.

Sean Derrington, storage product marketing director at Symantec said it's imperative that IT executives take a hard look at their disaster recovery strategies to prevent data pandemonium.

He recommends a product that rhymes with romantic. ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Latest Comments

50% success rate of DR testing

I've worked for 2 major international banks in the last 2 years (and been present for a DR test at a third) and the 50% sounds about right.

At the first the attitude was "Yay - for the first time we've managed to get SOMETHING to work after spending a whole weekend trying to fail over, shit get everything back where it's supposed to be for monday morning trading"

At the second they don't do DR tests, because the DR solution is not actually separated out from their normal sites (e.g. they have 3 main sites in the UK, and each can run the other's stuff if necessary) and therefore testing it would be a bitch... They're also pretty sure that it would "just work".

The third party DR test I was present for had about an 80% success rate for the business applications - the failures were related to remote working and security policies. They treated this as a failure of the test, and will be re-running it in a couple of months to confirm that they've fixed it.

So I'd say that out of the massive sample set of 3, 50% sounds fair ;)

0
0

BESRICfA...

... Isn't there a bridge over that, in some film recently?

0
0
Anonymous Coward

What product?

I can think of a possible company, but not a product that rhymes with romantic...

0
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
AMD lifts the veil on Opteron, ARM chip plans for 2014
Not much action going on in 2013, though
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches