Feeds

Intel to up 45nm Core 2 Extreme prices by 50% next year

Pricier Penryns coming down the 'pike

Business security measures using SSL

Updated Upcoming 'Penryn'-based 45nm high-end quad-core CPUs may well attract an even higher price premium than before, it has emerged. Intel has apparently informed customers that next year's Core 2 Extreme processors will cost up to 50 per cent more than today's models.

According to newly released Penryn pricing data posted by a number of websites, November's Core 2 Extreme QX9650 will cost $999 when sold in batches of 1000 chips. That's the price point Intel has maintained for the Extreme line of gaming processors since the family was introduced back in the Pentium D days.

However, Q1 2008 will see the 3GHz, 12MB L2, 1333MHz FSB chip joined by two 3.2GHz models: the QX9770 and the QX9775, priced at a staggering $1399 and $1499, respectively. It's not clear at this stage how the QX9775 and the QX9770 differ in order to warrant the extra five digits on the model number and the extra $100 on the price.

Update Yes it is: the QX9775 supports a 1600MHz FSB and it sits on the server-oriented LGA771 interconnect rather than the more commonplace LGA775. In short, it's a rebranded Xeon.

The Core 2 Extreme pricing is in marked contrast to what Intel apparently plans to charge for 45m, Core 2 Quad mainstream desktop chips. As we've reported before, Q1 2008 will see the arrival of the Q9300, Q9450 and the Q9550, clocked at 2.5, 2.66 and 2.83GHz, respectively, and all operating on a 1333MHz FSB. The Q9300 contains 6MB of L2; the others 12MB.

The sites' pricing data points to 1000-chip per-processor prices of $266, $316 and $530, respectively - close to what Intel currently charges for top-of-the-line dual-core and quad-core CPUs.

So, no price reduction, but no massive increase for Penryn either.

Q1 2008 is also expected to see the introduction of the dual-core 45nm Core 2 Duo E8200, E8400 and E8500 at 2.66, 3 and 3.16GHz, respectively, and priced at $163, $183 and $266. All three run on a 1333MHz FSB and contain 6MB of L2 cache.

New hybrid storage solutions

More from The Register

next story
4K-ing excellent TV is on its way ... in its own sweet time, natch
For decades Hollywood actually binned its 4K files. Doh!
Oi, Tim Cook. Apple Watch. I DARE you to tell me, IN PERSON, that it's secure
State attorney demands Apple CEO bows the knee to him
Apple's big bang: iPhone 6, ANOTHER iPhone 6 Plus and WATCH OUT
Let's >sigh< see what Cupertino has been up to for the past year
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Get your Indian Landfill Android One handsets - they're only SIXTY QUID
Cheap and deafening mobes for the subcontinental masses
Apple's SNEAKY plan: COPY ANDROID. Hello iPhone 6, Watch
Sizes, prices and all – but not for the wrist-o-puter
A SCORCHIO fatboy SSD: Samsung SSD850 PRO 3D V-NAND
4Gb/s speeds on a consumer drive, anyone?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.