The balkanization of Storm Worm botnets
New hope in blocking prolific pest
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Creators of the Storm Worm Trojan have introduced a change to their malware that could help administrators trying to fortify their ISPs and networks against the prolific pest.
PCs infected by Storm in the past week or so use a 40-byte key to encrypt traffic sent through Overnet, a peer-to-peer protocol that helps individual bots connect to other infected machines, according to Joe Stewart, a senior researcher with SecureWorks, a provider of security services and software.
The change effectively segments the Storm botnet, estimated by Stewart to contain from 250,000 to 1 million machines, into smaller networks because each node must know the password to unencrypt the Overnet traffic.
Storm burst on the scene early this year after a flurry of emails carried subjects promising information about a winter storm that was savaging Northern Europe. Many of the recipients ended up getting infected by a Trojan that made their PC part of a network of infected computers. Criminals use such botnets to send spam and carry out distributed denial of service attacks, in which servers are flooded with more data than they can handle.
Since then, Storm has waged a series of ever-changing attacks, including pump-and-dump stock spam, fraudulent e-card messages and emails that promise racy pictures or romance to the lovestruck. The Storm botnet is hard to eradicate using traditional techniques because it relies on P2P technology, rather than connecting through a single command and control server.
New Weapon
The widespread use of encryption would provide a new weapon for administrators to fight back against Storm. Until now, one of the only ways to protect a network from the Trojan was to block all P2P traffic. That was fine for corporations and other organizations, but often proved problematic for ISPs and university networks.
Encrypted Storm traffic looks significantly different than regular P2P traffic sent using the Overnet protocol, making it relatively easy to write firewall rules that block the former while still allowing the latter, Stewart says. A researcher for the Bleedingthreats blog has devised a generic set of signatures that look for certain UDP packet sizes typical of Storm.
The balkanizing of bots into distinct botnets could be a sign that the Storm authors plan to sell services to spammers or other cyber criminals. But so far, there is little evidence such plans are in place, because Storm is only segmenting bots into two groups: those created in the last week and those created earlier.
Stewart says there could be other reasons for breaking bots into smaller groups, such as the desire for more nimble and manageable networks. ®
COMMENTS
storm rules not useful
Just a warning to those wanting to use those Snort signatures - those rules are so generic, you are going to be chasing false positives all day and night.
@Andy Bright
Most inappropriate name evah!
Actually, most attacks on my servers seem to come from Belgium.
I am with Shannon: poor article
Storm is a very devious, complex and well-designed malevolent toolset. For a really good insight into all aspects of the design I would refer all readers who have got here and want to understand more to go to Bruce Schneier's blog, which has its home at:
http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram.html, look for "The Storm Worm" in the October 2007 archive page (it has 'fallen off the bottom' of the current page)
Bruce's entry refers out to a number of other articles and has attracted somehwat in excess of 100 comments.

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Data control in the cloud
Cloud based data management
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth