Skip to content

Biting the hand that feeds IT

The Register ®

Hardware:


Related Whitepapers

Comments on ‘Sun ships Niagara II servers’

High-throughput chip launched in two racks and a blade

Published Tuesday 9th October 2007 18:12 GMT

« Back to article page

Correction 

By Rusty D
Posted Wednesday 10th October 2007 11:25 GMT
Dead Vulture

Surely that should be 'eight cores per chip/die and eight threads per core' - to aid in clarity.

correction - one thread per core 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Wednesday 10th October 2007 13:02 GMT
IT Angle

These things don't really run eight threads per core. It eight cores with one thread per core. Eight threads cycle thru the core over time. Great for benchmarks, results may vary (widely) in real life.

http://www.geocities.com/sunsrockchip/

Re Re: correction - one thread per core 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Wednesday 10th October 2007 23:20 GMT
Thumb Up

No, you are spreading FUD.

Each N2 core has two integer pipelines and can execute two instructions from two different thread groups in parallel. While not suitable for all applications, it is much more capable compared to the original N1. Vastly increased FP capability expands the reach of workloads quite a bit. Have a look at the SAP-SD scores - it actually outshines 2S clovetowns (8 core in all) - at identical core count. So what are those 8 threads in each core doing ? First, each of them gets scheduled with 0 thread-switch penalty (much more efficient that software scheduled threads), and second, they are all fetching data from memory in parallel.

N2 two 10G ethernet interfaces on the chip, great and usable network bandwidth.

Add much superior on-chip crypto, cryptographic workloads will fly at no added cost.

The only thing I am disappointed with is the price, it's utterly outrageous. I guess Sun expects willing customers with suitable workloads to pay for it. Most x86 customers will probably be better off staying with x86 unless their workload is something that could fly on N2.

Your right....but I was not spreading FUD 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 16th October 2007 03:10 GMT
Thumb Up

Each core run's two threads, not the sixteen that Sun claims. Each chip runs 16 threads on the chip, not 64 in the marketing. An interesting question is the TLB is that shared? If it is two threads might not actually be running as the same time on each core. I guess it does not matter...good benchmark numbers...too bad our workloads dont match the thin threads you need and this system only has one chip...no vertical scalibility

I just don't get it 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Wednesday 17th October 2007 13:16 GMT
Flame

Why the vast majority of customers would invest in a Niagara II -based server environment when you can do 99% of what you need to do on X86 for a fraction of the cost is beyond me.

Back in the late 1990's, you didn't have a choice - if you needed performance Unix was it. Now, with quad core Intels, quad AMD's just about to be launched and the various intelligent clustering options from companies like Oracle, IBRIX and MSFT get you to where you need to be.

Port your app, get off the big iron and come and join the rest of us in the 21st century.

whitepaper title

Solution Brief: Reduce Energy Costs

Energy consumption has become a big issue. Dramatically increase server utilization and significantly reduce energy costs through Virtualization..
whitepaper title

Server Consolidation and Containment

This paper discusses how consolidation and containment solutions with a virtual infrastructure meet the challenges of server sprawl and underutilization..

Top 20 storiesAll The Week’s HeadlinesArchiveSearch