The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Teeny tiny ozone hole for 2007

This is unacceptable!! 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 09:43 GMT

It is unacceptable that we can still find ElReg articles using non-standard units! We all now that use of Dobson units should be discarded!

So, the right sentence would be: "...when the thickness falls below 0.01571 lg".

@ Anon Vulture 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 10:13 GMT

Once again Vulture, you amaze me with your comments!!!

Keep 'em coming!

Reduced growth, or shrinkage? 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 10:34 GMT

It's not entirely clear here as to whether the ozone hole is getting smaller (i.e. it has decreased from the "40 million tonne" hole in 2006, to a "27 million tonne" hole in 2007 - a reduction in size of about 33%), or whether the rate of growth has reduced from 40 million tonnes a year to 27 million tonnes a year (a reduction in growth rate of 33%, but an increase in size of ~68% on last year)?

Quite right 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 10:38 GMT

(Written by Reg staff.)

You are, of course, entirely correct. However, we reserve the right to be as non-standard as we like if we don't feel up to breaking out the calculator. So there.

Luce

Re: This is unacceptable!! 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 10:51 GMT

Unless, of course, they are Anita Dobson units.

Thickness is wrong anyway, we need to know the volume of the hole in ADHs (Anita Dobson's Hair).

great stuff 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 10:55 GMT

"Once the spring returns, this chlorine disrupts the ozone layer causing the ozone to unravel like a sock in urgent need of darning. ®"

I love The Reg :)

Measurements 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 11:29 GMT

I'm not upto speed with these Dobson Units, or lg's. Can you please convert it into MDPM (Matt Damon's Per Mile), or the standard 'double-decker-bus'?

Ozone Quantity? 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 12:53 GMT

So how much ozone is there in a hole a mile deep and three miles diameter?

@Dave : Ozone Quantity 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 13:23 GMT

Ok, Dave, I'll bite.

There is NO Ozone in the hole, because, um, its a hole!

You should really get a taxi now, you have no right to even get your coat. :)

SI units or IS Unit! 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 13:24 GMT

in order to prevent confusion withall of these different standards may I propose an universal, nay, Ideal Standard unit of measurement:

http://www.plumbworld.co.uk/images/pwis0806l.jpg

Note you can use this Ideal Standard as a unit of height (floor to seat) , length (wall to edge of seat), bredth (width of seat) weight (self explanitory I hope), volume (cystern only!), and even time (ie flush cycle)

Note: I only have a twice (sometimes more) daily affiliation with this company.

@Dave 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 13:41 GMT

That's a simple calculation:

exactly 4.6 times the empty space in a PS3 fanboi's head.

WHAT ?!?!?! 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 14:47 GMT

I think you guys are missing the fundimental issue here ... THERE ARE PEOPLE GETTING PAID TO MEASURE HOLES ?!?

heck, if its such a big problem, why don't we send all the politicians up there and see whether we can clog the hole ? they're full of hot air (well most of them) anyways.

As for an international standard, unfortunately a toilet isn't going to work (because some toilets don't have the top resevoir (my spelling is bad)).

Further more, the empty space in a PS3 fanboi's head is a huge void spanning only inches. if we used that we'd be in the millions of units.

Surely.... 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 15:46 GMT

We can come up with another SI base unit, say, I don't know, the COL (can of Lynx). An eighth base unit would get far more headline coverage. Maybe.

Shirley Surely... 

Posted Thursday 4th October 2007 16:33 GMT

"... another SI base unit, say, can of Lynx ... would get far more headline coverage."

If you want headline coverage, you need Silvikrin, not Lynx.

Ahem. Is that taxi still free?

Can't conclude? 

Posted Sunday 7th October 2007 22:27 GMT

They can't conclude that it is smaller this year based on the measurements but they concluded it was bigger last year on the same measurements?

In science, if you look for something long enough, you'll find it.

Don’t Miss

Dollar101 uses for a former merchant banker

Comment Innovators who work out the best one will make a killing

The Year in Operating Systems: No battle of big ideas

Small change for 2009

Photography: Yes, you have rights

Comment Unless the police say you haven't

Enormous HP box spotted from space

Exclusive pics of Peterborough packaging pandemonium