Feeds

3Com finally sells out to China

Could've been a contender

Boost IT visibility and business value

Networking gear nearly man 3Com has agreed to a $2.2bn buyout by an investment outfit backed by its former Chinese manufacturing partner Huawei Technologies.

The move, fronted by Bain Capital Partners, will take 3Com into private ownership and shareholders will bag a 44 per cent premium on the stocks' current $3.68 listing. Its last financials revealed widening losses of $18.7m, after hints of a potential comeback for the firm.

In July it was reported that Nortel and US-based private equity groups were sniffing around the firm for a possible takeover.

Links between 3Com and Huawei were forged when undisputed networking champ Cisco took Huawei to court over alleged patent infringements in 2003. 3Com stuck its oar in by taking Huawei's side.

The case was later dropped, and soon after 3Com and Huawei signed a joint venture agreement to attack Cisco's dominance. Last Novemeber however, 3Com bought Huawei out of the partnership for $882m.

As part of today's deal, Huawei affiliates take a minority stake in the firm, and Huawei will be a "commercial and strategic partner".

The announcement confirming today's deal is here. It'll go through in Q1 next year, assuming shareholders are happy to take the money and run.

3Com has negotiated a good mark-up on today's price. However, anyone who'd held onto their shares through thick and thin might be sobbing quietly. The company's shares debuted at around $28 a share back in 1989 and after a few early wobbles, started moving remorselessly upwards.

For at least part of the 90s networking boom the firm was mentioned in the same breath as Cisco, but whereas the latter bought itself into complete domination of the internet, 3Com inadvertently bought itself into the PDA market, picking up Palm when it bought dial-up modem vendor USRobotics.

In February 2000 3Com's shares were changing hands at an irrationally exhuberant $98. A $50 divi payment last that year brought things down to a much more sober $16 in August that year, though it still managed to touch $19 later that year. However, tech was definitely off the menu by then, and shares have been pretty much in single figures ever since.®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Object storage bods Exablox: RAID is dead, baby. RAID is dead
Bring your own disks to its object appliances
Nimble's latest mutants GORGE themselves on unlucky forerunners
Crossing Sandy Bridges without stopping for breath
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.