Feeds

Verizon launches US appeals court at Google-backed wireless plan

Throws Jello at Congress

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Much to Google's chagrin, Verizon has asked a federal court to shoot down new rules that would allow consumers to attach any device and any application to a prime portion of the U.S. wireless spectrum.

Earlier this week, the mega-telco filed a "petition for review" with the U.S. Court of Appeals, insisting it re-jigger Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules for the so-called 700-MHz band, a slice of wireless spectrum to be auctioned off in January. According to Verizon, the FCC's decision to open a portion of the band to any application and any device is "arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence, and otherwise contrary to law".

Verizon prefers the status quo, where it has complete control over any wireless bandwidth it licenses from the FCC.

Google is a leading voice calling for an overhaul of the status quo, and the Mountain View outfit is less-than-happy about Verizon's latest attempt to throttle the freedom of American internet users.

"The nation's spectrum airwaves are not the birthright of any one company. They are a unique and valuable public resource that belong to all Americans," Chris Sacca, Google's head of special initiatives, wrote on the company's public policy blog. "It's regrettable that Verizon has decided to use the court system to try to prevent consumers from having any choice of innovative services. Once again, it is American consumers who lose from these tactics."

Get your tanks off my spectrum

With an open access requirement in place, Google may bid for spectrum, hoping to sell it off to various independent ISPs and foster a new level of competition in the broadband market. That's the broadband market - not just the wireless market. The Mountain Viewers and their cohorts are battling Verizon's control over the wired internet as well.

Verizon's petition is vague, but judging from comments previously submitted to the FCC, the company is arguing that an open access requirement would restrict the "free speech" of the band's winning bidder. And clearly, Verizon sees itself as the winning bidder.

Will this argument hold up? Probably not, according to Jonathan Kramer, a telecommunications attorney with the Kramer Telecom Law Firm in Los Angeles. The FCC has already addressed Verizon's argument in the 700-MHz order it laid down this summer, and Kramer says the court isn't likely to reverse the commission's decision.

The FCC has made it clear that it's simply following a Congressional mandate to advance new technologies. "Verizon is claiming that whomever is awarded a license will have its commericial free speech restricted," Kramer told The Reg. "But the FCC has already said 'You're right, but that's appropriate for us to do because we're following the direction of Congress."

Wrestling with Jello

So, in essence, Verizon is attacking Congress as well as the FCC. "Verizon is taking the position that Congress - through the FCC - can't do this," Kramer said. "Getting that argument to stick is tough. You throw that one at the wall, and it's going to come down like Jello."

What happens if the court does side with Verizon? Don Evans, a lawyer with the D.C.-area telecommunications firm Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, says the FCC may or may not have the opportunity to appeal.

"There's a three judge panel that's assigned [to the petition]," Evans told us. "That panel will issue a decision and the next appellate level, if you wish, is review by the entire court, the nine judges that are on the D.C. circuit. Or you can go directly to the Supreme Court."

But all this has to happen mighty quickly. Congress has also mandated that the FCC hold its wireless auction before the end of January. Evans is sure that the court's initial ruling will decide the fate of the 700-MHz band. "As a practical matter, whatever the three judge panel rules will be how the auction proceeds."

As American sports mavens say, we're headed for a buzzer beater. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Download alert: Nearly ALL top 100 Android, iOS paid apps hacked
Attack of the Clones? Yeah, but much, much scarier – report
Broadband sellers in the UK are UP TO no good, says Which?
Speedy network claims only apply to 10% of customers
Virgin Media struck dumb by NATIONWIDE packet loss balls-up
Turning it off and on again fixes glitch 12 HOURS LATER
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
Fujitsu CTO: We'll be 3D-printing tech execs in 15 years
Fleshy techie disses network neutrality, helmet-less motorcyclists
Facebook, working on Facebook at Work, works on Facebook. At Work
You don't want your cat or drunk pics at the office
Soz, web devs: Google snatches its Wallet off the table
Killing off web service in 3 months... but app-happy bonkers are fine
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
How to determine if cloud backup is right for your servers
Two key factors, technical feasibility and TCO economics, that backup and IT operations managers should consider when assessing cloud backup.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Protecting against web application threats using SSL
SSL encryption can protect server‐to‐server communications, client devices, cloud resources, and other endpoints in order to help prevent the risk of data loss and losing customer trust.