The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Comcast throttles BitTorrent users

Spilling seed on barren ground

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

It looks like Comcast, America's biggest cable network, has put the squeeze on BitTorrent users.

On Friday, the widely-read BitTorrent blog TorrentFreak reported that many Comcast users were unable to "seed" their BitTorrent downloads, which severely slows the exchange of music and video over the popular P2P protocol. Comcast has denied any-wrongdoing, but hundreds of BitTorrent mavens continue to complain.

"Over the past weeks more and more Comcast users started to notice that their BitTorrent transfers were cut off," wrote Ernesto, the mononym behind TorrentFreak. "Most users report a significant decrease in download speeds, and even worse, they are unable to seed their downloads. A nightmare for people who want to keep up a positive ratio at private trackers and for the speed of BitTorrent transfers in general."

According to Ernesto, ISPs have been throttling BitTorrent traffic for "almost two years," but he says that Comcast has taken the practice a step further with its clampdown on seeding. In seeding a BitTorrent file they've just downloaded, users are - in essence - offering it up to others on the network. If you prevent seeding, you slow down the entire BitTorrent process. Plus, you make it more difficult for users to upload as much BitTorrent data as they're downloading - which could get them kicked off private BitTorrent "trackers," the servers that coordinate file swaps.

Comcast assured us that it was not doing what Ernesto claims it's doing. Under its current network policy, according to a company spokesman, the company would never block BitTorrent traffic - or traffic related to any other application. The only thing the company would admit to was making polite phone calls to customers guilty of extending some unspecified bandwidth threshold.

"Customers who are notified of excessive use typically and repeatedly consume exponentially more bandwidth than an average residential user, which would include, for example, the equivalent of sending 256,000 photos a month, or sending 13 million emails every month (or 18,000 emails every hour, every day, all month)," the company said. "In these rare instances, Comcast’s policy is to pro-actively contact the customer via phone to work with them and address the issue or help them select a more appropriate commercial-grade Comcast product."

Nonetheless, a new post from Ernesto says that hundreds of his readers have complained about seeding issues on Comcast. "The problems are still happening as we speak," he told The Reg. "There seem to be regional differences, though. Not everyone is affected."

Ernesto speculates that Comcast is using Sandvine broadband traffic management equipment to prevent seeding, and according to one TorrentFreak reader, two Comcast tech employees have admitted to adopting the technology- though they wouldn't comment on the BitTorrent issue. ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Latest Comments
Anonymous Coward

If you aren't using 100% of your bandwidth at all times, you are hurting the environment

If you look at this from a carbon footprint point of view, the only way to minimize your carbon footprint is to use 100% of your bandwidth at all times. Why? Well, your bill pays mostly for the infrastructure of laying cables and powering routers. Now your cable company spent a lot of energy building this infrastructure. It's there costing energy whether you use it or not. Not using 100% is like filling your giant SUV with gas, and leaving it running in Park and not going anywhere. Whether you are downloading or not you should be seeding torrents, assisting bandwidth sharing for Skype or a P2P streaming TV service, etc. Otherwise you are hurting the environment.

Also just a nod to this quote: [ISPs have the] right to restrict protocols that everyone knows are mainly used of illigitimate purposes

Actually, it isn't the ISP's right. They really should not be responsible for enforcing laws (or trying to decide legality.) That's the police's job. If it was ISP's right to enforce the law, then I should be able to shoot drug dealers and in general vigilantism is not legal here.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

pissant

Is that French? I like it.

Je suis un pissant. Je vais allez a la pissoir avec mez torrents.

0
0

@Fred Fnord

Yup, I think you're definitely getting to the heart of my argument there. My requirement to be able to use the bandwidth I'm paying for in a reasonable manner *is* more important than the ability of some greedy pissants to continually stuff their "Fuck the RIAA" sticker clad hard drives with bootleg media.

Much, much more important.

0
0

More from The Register

1,000 O2 staff chose redundancy over Capita
Betrayal, or just decent terms?
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
 breaking news
Pttow! Ofcom kicks hams out of MoD bands
Geet off my land, you, you ... 'secondary user'
 breaking news
Now you can use your phone instead of your wallet at the ATM, too
Blimey, these little paper towels out of the vending machine are really expensive
 breaking news
UK.gov's £530m bumpkin broadband rollout: 'Train crash waiting to happen'
Whitehall whispers of damning watchdog report next month
 breaking news
MySpace zaps millions of teens' tearful rants, causes wave of angst
'Your crappy redesign SUCKS, I wanna read my blogs' screech users
 breaking news
Microsoft Office 365 on iPhone NOW: No, we're not making this up
Word, Excel, Powerpoint for your pocket-stroker
 breaking news
EU signs off on eCall emergency-phone-in-every-car plan
GPS and a mobe in every car - do you suppose the NSA would fancy that?