Is anyone happy with VoIP phones in their office? #
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 18:08 GMT
I've worked in several offices with Cisco VoIP phones.
The phones themselves are nice, and offer some features you can't have in standard analog or PBX based phones, however, I've found the audio quality to be horrible, and the phones seem to be more susceptible to outages and drop outs.
Of course, that could just be do to the administration staff at these locations or poor central hardware choices and configs. So I'm curious, is anyone happy with their VoIP deployment?
By Kevin McMurtriePosted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 19:41 GMT
Is Cisco implying that this is an obscure exploit requiring SIP hacking? That's an amazing spin. Any packets rapidly sent to the phone's IP address causes it to reboot. You might have even rebooted your phone by accident.
By Morely DotesPosted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 22:30 GMT
We use VoIP for voice calls to and from our remote offices in the US and Canada. Quality is equivalent (or superior) to POTS, with a uncommon "underwater gargling" effect when the bandwidth (also used for data) is saturated. That could probably be fixed with a QoS patch to prioritize voice, but it really isn't important enough to bother.
At home, I have what is essentially VoIP on my fibre data feed, and only rarely do I notice anything less that the quality (or lack of it) we got with POTS. It's vastly superior to the voice quality of my cellular service (I'm on Verizon and have used AT&T, Sprint, and a couple of smaller cellular phones. The kindest thing I can say is that Verizon sucks less than the others).
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 23rd August 2007 05:19 GMT
Unless I have totally mis-read the article and Cisco's release, they are not implying that you have to be hacking SIP. They are saying that the problem appears only on the SIP firmware load not the SCCP firmware load. Cisco would really prefer people using their VOIP phones to buy into the entire ecosystem of Call Managers, Unity VM, etc, and their SCCP signaling rather than the standards based SIP signaling. I have actually had more problems with Cisco phones rebooting due to moving the phone when the RJ-45 connection is not tight and loosing the PoE.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 23rd August 2007 07:29 GMT
No, nobody I know is happy with the quality of VOIP audio, the way the quality degrades when network useage increases or the almost satellite like delays which randomly occur. As for the CTI software, forget it, it's more hassle than it's worth, epsecially with hotdesking.
Comments on: Crash bug blights Cisco IP phones
Is anyone happy with VoIP phones in their office? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 18:08 GMT
Spin control #
By Kevin McMurtrie Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 19:41 GMT
Happy enough #
By Morely Dotes Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 22:30 GMT
Not Spin, just SIP #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 23rd August 2007 05:19 GMT
CTI popups and crappy quality #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 23rd August 2007 07:29 GMT
Perfectly happy #
By Chris Posted Thursday 23rd August 2007 13:04 GMT