Feeds

Yahoo! tops! Google! on! customer! satisfaction! survey!

'You like me! You really like me!'

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

A rare bit of good news for Yahoo!: "For the first time ever" - i.e. for the first time in five years - the beleaguered web portal has topped arch-rival Google on a much-discussed customer satisfaction survey sponsored by the University of Michigan.

With the University's new report on search engines and portals, culled from its annual American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) survey, Yahoo!'s customer satisfaction score jumped 3.9 per cent, while Google's took a 3.7 per cent plunge. That puts Yahoo! at the top of the ACSI rankings, with a score of 79 (out of 100), with Google just behind at 78. Frankly, we find this very hard to believe.

"Since the ACSI has long been proven scientifically to be a leading indicator of growth and stock prices, a rising ACSI score indicates that Yahoo!'s fortunes may again be on the rise, even as it suffers a beating in the financial press," wrote Larry Freed, president and CEO of ForeSee Results, the sponsor of the ACSI report.

Freed believes that Yahoo! may have already lost the search battle - and we agree - but he's sure the company can still come out ahead in the war of the portals. "The question for Yahoo! becomes whether it can secure enough dominance as a portal to increase ad dollars and profitability. Customers seem to be saying 'yes,' and brand new CEO Jerry Yang can move forward with a strong base of customer satisfaction."

Meanwhile, Ask.com boasts the biggest improvement on this year's survey, jumping 5.6 per cent to a score of 75. Pointing to the site's new Ask3D relaunch, Freer says that Google "should be scared" of the plucky search engine. "Ask.com seems to be well-positioned to rival Google in the coming years because it has a strong search technology lauded by analysts and users alike," he said. Sorry, Larry. We don't agree on this one.

Bootnote

There seems to be some disagreement about Yahoo! headlines at The Reg. So we're running a customer satisfaction survey of our own: Exclamation marks or no exclamation marks? Please let us know. ®

Reducing the cost and complexity of web vulnerability management

More from The Register

next story
'Windows 9' LEAK: Microsoft's playing catchup with Linux
Multiple desktops and live tiles in restored Start button star in new vids
Not appy with your Chromebook? Well now it can run Android apps
Google offers beta of tricky OS-inside-OS tech
New 'Cosmos' browser surfs the net by TXT alone
No data plan? No WiFi? No worries ... except sluggish download speed
Greater dev access to iOS 8 will put us AT RISK from HACKERS
Knocking holes in Apple's walled garden could backfire, says securo-chap
NHS grows a NoSQL backbone and rips out its Oracle Spine
Open source? In the government? Ha ha! What, wait ...?
Google extends app refund window to two hours
You now have 120 minutes to finish that game instead of 15
Intel: Hey, enterprises, drop everything and DO HADOOP
Big Data analytics projected to run on more servers than any other app
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.