Video sharing site Veoh Networks has filed a pre-emptive lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG), requesting that the courts prevent UMG from suing it for copyright infringement.

Veoh has copyright infringing material aplenty on its site, but argues that it's entitled to "safe harbour" provisions because it doesn't encourage infringement (although it hardly needs to) and it helps monitor infringement (but not very well).

AT&T has vowed to fight infringement too, using deep packet inspection to root out P2P sharers. All are moves which weaken the "safe harbour" defence - hence Veoh's desire to see the principle (which doesn't really apply in many jurisdictions outside the US) strengthened.

However, even in the land of the frivolous lawsuit, the courts are unlikely to favour a case that restricts the enforcement of property rights. And lawyers, who can rarely agree on anything, will be united in their view that more lawsuits are undoubtedly a good thing for everyone. ®

Related stories

• Hosts can process user-submitted videos within 'safe harbor' (9 January 2009)
• AP sues Moreover over aggravated aggregation (12 October 2007)
• Man sues God (21 September 2007)
• AT&T's race car logo lawsuit crashes and burns (15 August 2007)
• Google's permanent video sales less-than-permanent (11 August 2007)
• YouTube video-fingerprinting due in September (30 July 2007)
• Warner rescues imeem from indie-music hell (12 July 2007)
• MySpace succumbs to The Buttock (11 July 2007)
• Video download site ordered to spy on users (12 June 2007)
• EMI and YouTube shake hands and hips (1 June 2007)
• MySpace to curb copyright violation (14 May 2007)
• MidemNet Universal exec - say goodbye to the old record co. (20 January 2007)