Novell CEO confirms that Microsoft is a reality
Come to our world
SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had
LinuxWorld Novell's chief executive has justified his company's contentious Microsoft hook-up to open source devotees by claiming the deal is critical to the long-term success of their favorite operating system.
Ron Hovsepian today, during a speech, warned LinuxWorld attendees against complacency over Linux's perceived success in both market share and partner support. He claimed Linux has not yet reached its potential, and is - in fact - at a tipping point.
Linux can only reach its potential by working with Microsoft and proprietary code, and by getting more applications running on different Linux distributions.
Despite nearly a decade of success for Linux, one fundamental issue has not been solved by the community: helping ISVs overcome the expense and time needed to port applications to different distributions that use different APIs and packages.
To that end, Hovsepian called for a re-doubling of efforts to standardize the way ISVs certify software using a vendor-neutral process. "Certification is not transferable across distributions... the risk we have is we are going to fragment the ISVs," Hovsepian said.
"We need to take advantage of what the Linux Standard Base has already built... I don't want us to create more oversight bodies."
It was a performance that saw Hovsepian call Microsoft a reality the community must work with while also flattering two of the staunchest critics of his deal with Microsoft - the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and its chief lawyer Eben Moglen - for creating the thing they believe his deal violates: the GPL.
Acknowledging there'd been a "lot of hot conversation" with Moglen and the FSF, Hovsepian said "Linux would not be where it is today" without the GPL. He also committed to Novell shipping new SuSE Linux packages under GPL v3.
That "hot conversation" was fueled by the FSF's claims it's engineered GPL3 to nullify Novell's Microsoft deal. Microsoft, meanwhile, has bluntly refused to recognize it's bound by the GPL.
Skimming over the details of Microsoft's support, Hovespian said such deals are critical if Linux is going to give customers running mixed environments what they need, by delivering interoperability in the data center and on the desktop.
"Microsoft is a reality in that mixed source world. The acceptance of mixed source by all of us is going to be a critical part of long-term success," he said.
"Linux should be everywhere," Hovsepian said. "But we are not truly there yet and I don't want us to fall asleep at this point in time.
"If we truly believe Linux is going to ever replace Unix and has the potential to replace the desktop of Windows, we have work to do it. If Linux is to realize its place as the dominant platform then we need to improve our progress as a team."®
COMMENTS
Loadable Modules
"So, I was hallucinating the "load on first open, unload on last close" drivers that were part of RT-11 from at least the early 1970s?"
loadable kernel modules != loadable device drivers
loadable kernel modules > loadable device drivers
Loadable Modules
So, I was hallucinating the "load on first open, unload on last close" drivers that were part of RT-11 from at least the early 1970s? Right, they weren't named "modules" and they didn't have nifty features like modprobe.conf _silently_ overriding options, but then RT-11 ran in 32K of memory, so that should count for something. :-)
Pace - I am not saying that Linux doesn't offer many more services than a 32K PDP-11 without memory-management did almost 40 years ago, but "the first time I ever saw" is not the same as "the first time it ever happened"
Standardization the Microsoft way
Does he mean standardize like the way Microsoft does or by the usual definition?
The Microsoft way is where you pay them money to use some proprietary piece of crap they own and that they used their monopoly to force into the market.
Just because they paid him a wagon load of money doesn't mean he can force the GPL to comply to what billwg wants. I wonder if Darl M. got a better deal?
On UNIX there is BSD, HPUX ( if only on Itanic ) AIX, OSX (BSD), Irix is doen but not out, Solaris, etc.
Microsoft should be made to come to Linux not the other way around no matter how much graft they pay executives from other companies.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
